The map Beijing released in June. The Torsa Nallah is in green, flowing left to right through Doklam
By Ajai Shukla
Business Standard, 13th Jan 18
In New Delhi on Friday, army chief General
Bipin Rawat provided the first authoritative account of a globally watched 73-day
confrontation last year when India and China almost came to blows. The face off
between several hundred armed soldiers from China and India took place at
Doklam – an 89 square kilometre patch of land that is claimed by both China and
Bhutan.
The face-off began on June 16, when Indian
troops moved in strength into Doklam –territory that it did not own or claim –
to block a large team of Chinese construction workers, escorted by troops of
the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), who began extending a track partly built
during previous years. After weeks of tension, the crisis de-escalated on
August 28 after tough negotiations between New Delhi and Beijing.
With both governments non-committal,
analysts on both sides claimed victory – that they had forced the other side to
withdraw. But today, Rawat admitted that Indian troops withdrew to their side
of the border, while the PLA remains in Doklam.
Rawat’s verbatim account, with editors’
notes in brackets, is as follows.
“Doklam is an area that is divided into two
parts: North Doklam and South Doklam. The Torsa nallah separates the two (green
line on map, flowing left to right in Dong Lang, the Chinese name for Doklam).
In South Doklam is a ridge called the Jampheri ridge, where the Royal Bhutan
Army maintains a seasonal post. This is at the southern extremity of Doklam.
“As far as Northern Doklam is concerned,
there are three passes… Through these passes, specifically through a pass
called Batang La, the Chinese had been building a road since 2000… a little
before. Till June 2016, they had come in quite close to our area and to the
Torsa Nala. They would come, build a road and go back.
“But one fine day last year the Chinese
came with fairly large amount of equipment, large amount of people, supported
by the PLA. Up to June 2016 there was fairly inconspicuous activity – one or
two bulldozers that would scrape the earth and go away. But this time we found
that the kind of equipment and manpower they came with, they meant business. We
felt they would probably try and claim the whole of Doklam and build a road
there, and probably reach where the RBA post was [at Jampheri]. That was our impression.
“We realised that if this was going to
happen, we would have to block it. This was posing a threat to us and was
changing the status quo… and violating our agreement with the Chinese to
maintain the status quo. So we were compelled to take action and block them.
That led to a stalemate, which continued [for 73 days].”
“[After the negotiated disengagement of
August 28] the PLA has occupied Northern Doklam. They are there...
“During the Doklam crisis, let me tell you
we had excellent coordination with the government; I daresay between the PMO,
the ministry of external affairs (MEA), the ministry of defence and the army.
“The issue was that we had actually stepped
into territory that wasn’t ours. And when you step into a territory which is
not yours, the MEA comes in. It is not that you have stepped into your
territory, but into territory which either belonged to China or to Bhutan. It
didn’t belong to us.
“So hereinafter, what happened is that the
China have stayed put in that area… The disengagement said that we should not
have a face-to-face confrontation, because here we were face-to-face. We said
we should separate out. That separation has taken place.
“We have come back from where we had
stepped in, [and returned] to our own territory. We are now on the watershed.
And the Chinese too have gone back that much distance. But behind that, they
have continued to maintain themselves.
“When this [Doklam] escalation took place,
we saw a large number of [Chinese] troops in other areas of Tibet, including
some guns and some tanks and other equipment. But let me tell you that we have
seen that complete equipment almost gone. But as far as the North Doklam area
is concerned… the Chinese are there.
“But there too, thinning out has happened.
We had worked out in the disengagement that we would keep the separation
between us. But even behind that, while there are a large number of tents in
that area, a large amount of troops have gone back from that area. We are not
seeing the kind of activity that we were seeing in that area in the month of
June, July and August.
“The tents remain. He (the Chinese) had
constructed some toilets and those toilets remain. He had created some
observation posts… and those structures remain. But we are seeing a reduction
in manpower.
“As of now, we feel the de-escalation has
happened because of the winter months, maybe; or because he felt it was time to
de-escalate. But because the structures are still there – he has a lot of
temporary structures – there is a possibility of movement again taking place
once the winter months get over.
“Should he come in again, we will again
take a call on what has to be done. But let me tell you diplomatic efforts are
on to de-escalate everything and see that everything returns to normalcy.
“More important now is the engagement
between Bhutan and China, and how they resolve the issue. There are border
demarcation talks also happening between Bhutan and China. How they progress,
we will have to wait and watch.”
Chinas salami slicing is well known. SRI LANKA NEPAL & PAKISTAN may soon be economically dependant on China. IN THAT CASE IT IS ONLY A MATTER OF TIME THAT BHUTAN IS LURED IN BY THE DRAGON.
ReplyDeleteAFTER WHICH OUR DOKLAM SITUATION WILL BE EXTREMELY PRECARIOUS
GOOD information
ReplyDeleteThe process of disengagement at Doklam was to ensure that the soldiers of two armies are not face-to-face. We returned to our side on the watershed and the Chinese moved by an equal distance,” he said. “The Chinese are still there in north Doklam area. There is thinning happening, a large amount of troops have gone out (from the time of the face-off) but Chinese tents, observation posts, storage shelters and structures remain there.
ReplyDelete“The de-escalation by the Chinese could be due to winter months. These temporary structures are there, (and) there is a possibility of Chinese movement after the winter. Should they (the Chinese) come in again, we will take a call on how to deal with it.” Gen Rawat said,
The Chinese moved back by an equal distance,Ajai pls dont cherry pick words.
NSR says ---
ReplyDeleteI wrote many times in various places about the need to use same kind of road laying equipment the Chinese civilians are using to built at least simple roads towards the perceived and patrolled LCA boundary...
Providing the villages with off road ATV vehicles and binoculars and radio sets to contact t ITBP/Army in case of incursions like Doklam, AP, Ladakh, etc
They are building roads because India-China agreement of 2005 says that the settled areas must stay with the respective countries...
So instead of exchanging the maps, the Chinese are trying to change the LAC through road building...
Build roads and let the villagers graze their cattle all the way to the LAC with the help oof ITBP and Army...
Provide liberal assistance and homes to the ex-servicemen or any family willing to relocate near, China, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Myanmar border areas...
Provide very very very liberal assistance to solve the issues...