By Ajai Shukla
Business Standard, 16th Dec 17
The defence ministry has issued a secret
Request for Information (RFI) to global torpedo firms, for supplying over 100 heavyweight
torpedoes for the Indian Navy’s Scorpene submarines, the first of which – INS Kalvari
– was commissioned on Thursday.
Prospective vendors are unwilling to speak,
since they have signed a non-disclosure agreement. However three sources in the
defence ministry and industry have verified this development.
While the torpedo RFI was issued in August
and replies received in November from at least three global “original equipment
manufacturers” (OEMs), a long wait lies ahead before the new torpedoes become
available to arm the Kalvari and five more submarines that will follow it into
service. The defence ministry’s Defence Procurement Procedure of 2016 allows
114 weeks (two years and three months) for concluding a contract, in practice an
over-ambitious target. After the contract, manufacture and delivery would take
another 2-3 years.
Until then, the navy’s six Kalvari-class boats (as the navy refers
to submarines) will share 64 obsolescent SUT torpedoes with four HDW Shishumar-class vessels. This is
woefully inadequate if the submarine fleet has to fight a war.
Further, there are question marks over the
efficacy of the SUT torpedo, even though German OEM, Atlas Elektronik, was
contracted in July 2013 to upgrade 64 SUT torpedoes and extend their service
life by 15 years.
Business Standard learns the navy’s new
torpedo RFI went out to 5-6 torpedo OEMs, but will boil down to a contest
between French OEM, Naval Group, which is offering its F-21 torpedo; and German
firm, Atlas Elektronik, with its Seahake Mod 4. It is understood that Russian
and Japanese OEMs and Swedish company, Saab, were also sent RFIs. However, the
Japanese did not respond; the Russian torpedo does not meet the Indian Navy’s
specifications; nor does Saab’s, which is driven by a combustion engine while
the navy wants an electrically driven torpedo.
The heavyweight torpedo is a submarine’s
weapon of choice for sinking warships and submarines, which it typically engages
from 50-100 kilometres away. Fired from a torpedo tube, it is driven through
the water by a motor powered by electric batteries. It is guided towards the
target by signals conveyed through a wire that unspools behind it. Approaching
the target, the torpedo switches to “active guidance” using on-board sonar.
When it slams into the target, an explosive charge detonates, creating an
underwater hole that often causes catastrophic flooding, sinking the target
vessel.
Besides torpedoes, submarines also carry
anti-ship missiles (ASMs) like the Kalvari’s SM39 Exocet missile. ASMs are
fired through the same tubes as torpedoes, and they emerge from the water and
fly, skimming the sea, towards their target. But ASMs can be intercepted, and
they are less lethal since they strike above the waterline.
The navy’s torpedo deficit has arisen due
to the blacklisting of Italian conglomerate Finmeccanica, after allegations
emerged in 2012 of bribery in the sale of twelve AW-101 helicopters to India by
a Finmeccanica subsidiary, AgustaWestland. The defence ministry, on August 26,
2014, banned all new contracts with Finmeccanica group companies, including WASS,
which had been chosen to supply 98 Black Shark torpedoes to India for the
Scorpene fleet.
Global torpedo manufacturers believe India
could be their largest customer. Although the current procurement is for only 100-plus
torpedoes, industry experts say the navy actually requires 400-600 torpedoes.
These are needed to arm six Scorpenes currently being rolled out, six Project
75-I submarines that are on the anvil, and a planned fleet of up to ten nuclear
submarines.
With the cost of a heavyweight torpedo
hovering around $2-3 million apiece, that represents a business opportunity of
$800 million to $1.8 billion – a mouth-watering prospect for torpedo makers.
If the cost of the torpedoes the navy is
currently buying tops Rs 2,000 crore ($311 million), the OEM will incur a 30
per cent offset liability. This would involve ploughing back 30 per cent of the
contract value into Indian defence production. Since each torpedo costs an
estimated $2-3 million, a 100-plus-torpedo order would be on the offset
threshold.
Industry sources say buying torpedoes
piecemeal – initially for the Kalvari-class,
then for Project 75-I, and separately for the nuclear boats – would disadvantage
India. Instead, a single order that combines India’s torpedo requirements would
result in cheaper prices through economies of scale; and also create a
compelling industrial logic for transferring torpedo production to India.
NSR says ---
ReplyDeleteEconomy of scale is a great reason and should be followed...
Since it is India's emergency, the arms merchants will get their dearest pound of flesh...
Italian PM came and went ...
Is there any chance to get Balckshark after some kind of settlement?
They were promising full TOT...
You can't hold every division in a company responsible for other divisions mistakes...
Also we are buying Naval guns named Oto Melara...
They may give India a better deal under pressure to hold to the market...
As soon as they blacklisted, they should have installed F-21 related tubes and bought their torpedoes...
France uses F-21 in Barracuda...
No end to stupidity in Indian contract fiascos...
Hope the torpedos come real fast , this could 5-6 years !
ReplyDeleteBig goof up in procurement . We need to blame indecisive MoD & faulty purchae process.
PERFECT ARTICLE , it suppose to be a eye opener to defence and delay department .
ReplyDeleteLets be honest, Navy is in no rush. It knows that 56-inch chest is missing the balls, these torpedo's will simply be losing their life span, sitting on the shelf.
ReplyDeletePrasun
How does 100-plus torpedoes costing $2-3mn a piece become a 800mn to 1.8bn deal?
ReplyDelete