By Ajai Shukla
Business Standard, 18th Aug 17
The two-month-long confrontation between
Chinese and Indian troops in Doklam, on the Sikkim-Bhutan border, is raising
tempers elsewhere on the Sino-Indian border, most notably Ladakh, where China
enjoys an operational and logistic advantage over India, unlike large sections
of Sikkim and Arunachal Pradesh.
For decades, Indian and Chinese patrols
have confronted each other with relative restraint. At worst, words would be exchanged
and some pushing and jostling carried out before both sides disengaged and
returned to their camps. Even during longer intrusions, like at Depsang in 2012
and Chumar in 2013, both sides scrupulously avoided physical violence.
This absence of bloodshed has been
instrumental in ensuring a peaceful Line of Actual Control (LAC), as visualised
by the Sino-Indian “Peace and Tranquillity Agreement” of 1993.
On Independence Day, however, mounting Chinese
frustration boiled over at the scenic Pangong Lake. At about 7 a.m., a couple
of hours before the two sides exchanged traditional gifts of sweets at nearby
Chushul, a Chinese patrol consisting of “border defence” troops from their post
at Khurnak Fort began pelting stones at an Indian patrol that had come to the
same location – the hotly disputed “Finger 5” area.
The Indian patrol consisted of a mix of
personnel from the Indo-Tibet Border Police (ITBP) and army soldiers from the
local infantry battalion. They apparently retaliated before their commanders reined
them in and defused the situation.
Participants in that clash say the Chinese
were carrying iron rods, in addition to their personal weapons. This was
apparently because an Indian patrol to the same area, the previous day, had
carried wooden sticks (lathis).
No injuries were caused by firearms or the
sticks, but there were minor bruises and cuts caused by the stone-pelting.
“We were restrained all through, but the
Chinese border guards were very aggressive. There were a lot of abuses shouted
at one another, but that was a waste in the absence of interpreters”, says an
Indian officer, tongue-in-cheek.
“The code of conduct that has held since
1993 is now under stress. We are aware that Doklam is a factor on the Chinese
side. But we are trying to ensure that the situation is not complicated by an
incident where soldiers from either side are hurt. That would complicate Doklam
even further”, he said.
Modi's Doklam tree is bearing fruit. Now whatever may happen to our soldiers, his next speech is ready 'I stood up to China, where Congress never did. (So, vote for me)'. Meanwhile, some coffins will come home.
ReplyDeleteThis same border, with same Chinese, was kept quiet by UPA for 10 year.
Any comments on this video, which is the Indian side
ReplyDeletehttps://twitter.com/republic/status/898882185905684481
dragon... still... browbeating... elephant... 1962...
ReplyDeleteYes..instead of NDA, if it had been the UPA government then they would never have objected to the road construction by the Chinese thus compromising Indian security. Hence the same border would have remained quiet. That's the difference between the present Govt. and the past.
ReplyDelete