By Ajai Shukla
Business Standard, 29th June 17
Compared to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s
three substantive summit meetings with former president Barack Obama between
2014-16, there are notable departures in the joint statement that was issued on
Monday after the Indian PM met President Donald Trump.
The departures relate to the prioritisation
of strategic relations; US support for India on China pushing an economic
corridor through Jammu & Kashmir (J&K); naming Pakistan as a source of
terror; and an Indian role in Afghanistan.
(Text continues after comparison chart)
|
Sept 2014, Washington
|
Jan 2015, New Delhi
|
Jun 2016, Washington
|
Jun 2017 in
Washington
|
Mantra
|
Chalein
Saath Saath; (Forward Together We Go)
|
Sanjha
Prayas, Sab ka Vikas; (Shared Effort, Progress
for All)
|
Enduring Global Partners in the 21st
Century
|
US and India – Prosperity through
Partnership
|
Statements
|
US-India Vision Statement
|
1.
New Delhi Declaration of Friendship
2.
Joint Strategic Vision for Asia Pacific
|
Joint statement after Modi met Obama for
“Working Visit”
|
Joint statement after Modi met Trump
|
Topic
order in Joint Statement (which suggests order of priorities)
|
1. Economic growth
2. Energy and climate change
3. Defence and homeland security
4. High tech, space and health
cooperation
5. Global issues and regional
consultations.
|
1.
Economic growth
2.
Defence and homeland security
3. Clean energy
4. Climate change
5. Global issues and regional
consultations.
|
1.
Climate change and clean energy
2.
Clean energy finance
3.
Strengthening global non-proliferation
4. Land, Maritime, Air, Space and cyber
security.
5.
Terrorism and violent extremism.
6. Economics and trade.
7. Technology & health
8. Global leadership.
9.
People-to-people ties.
|
1. Partnership in the Indo-Pacific
region.
2. Terrorism cooperation.
3. Strategic convergence.
4. Free and fair trade.
|
Defence
& homeland security and maritime cooperation
|
1. Treat each other like “their closest
partners.
2. Will renew for 10 years the “Framework
Agreement for Defence”.
3. US mine blast-resistant vehicles to
India
|
1. Welcomed Pentagon’s rapid reaction
team to focus on DTTI*.
2. Need for defence ties to focus on tech
cooperation, co-production, co-development
3. Welcomed intensified coop in maritime,
as reflected in the 2015 Defence Framework Agreement
4. To enhance maritime coop further.
|
1. Cooperation roadmap made out under
Defence Framework Agreement.
2. Welcomed inaugural Maritime Security
Talks.
3. Agreement for sharing “White Shipping”
data.
4. Welcomed finalisation of Logistics
Exchange Agreement (LEMOA).
5. To explore agreements that will
further expand defence cooperation.
6. US recognised India as “Major Defence
Partner”.
7. Finalised agreement on aircraft
carrier technology cooperation.
|
1. Deepen cooperation based on US
designation of India as a “major defence partner”.
2. US offered India sale of Sea Guardian
unmanned aerial systems.
3. Enhance implementation of the “White
Shipping” data sharing arrangement.
4. Trump welcomed Modi’s invitation for
US to join Indian Ocean Naval Symposium.
|
Asian
security architecture
|
1. Need for freedom of navigation and
over flight in the region, especially in the South China Sea.
2. Resolution of territorial and maritime
disputes through peaceful means.
3.
Explore upgrading of trilateral talks with Japan to Foreign Minister
level.
|
1. “Joint Strategic Vision”: importance
of maritime security and freedom of navigation and over flight throughout the
region, especially in the South China Sea.
2. Resolution of territorial and maritime
disputes through peaceful means.
3. Committed to strengthening the East
Asia Summit on 10th anniversary.
4. Cited the US-Japan-India dialogue to
urge projects of common interest.
|
No mention of Indo-Pacific or Asian
security.
|
1. Close partnership between the US and
India central to peace and stability in Indo-Pacific.
2.
Called on regional countries to adhere to set of common principles:
(a) Freedom of navigation, overflight and commerce.
(b) Resolve disputes peacefully.
|
Joint
military training
|
To upgrade the Malabar exercise
|
Reiterated commitment to upgrade naval Ex
Malabar
|
Welcomed enhanced mil-to-mil cooperation,
especially in disaster relief operations.
|
1. Noting importance of Malabar naval
exercise in July, agreed to expand scope.
2. Agreed to explore new training exercises.
|
Counter-terrorism
cooperation
|
1. Concern over terrorism, mentions ISIL
2. Dismantle safe havens for terrorist
and criminal networks.
3. Disrupt all networks such as Al Qaeda,
LeT, JeM, D-Company, and Haqqanis
4. Pakistan to bring to justice Mumbai
2008 perpetrators.
5. Identify modalities for terrorist
watch list exchange
|
1. US-India partnership a defining
counterterrorism relationship for the 21st century.
2. Zero tolerance of threat posed by groups
like Al Qaida and ISIL.
3. Need for joint and concerted efforts
to disrupt entities such as LeT, JeM, D Company and Haqqani Network.
4. Pakistan to bring to justice Mumbai
2008 perpetrators.
5. Develop action plan through the
Homeland Security Dialogue and Joint Working Group on Counter Terrorism.
6. Deepen collaboration on UN terrorist
designations
|
1. Deepening cooperation based on
September 2015 US-India Joint Declaration on Combating Terrorism.
2. Strengthen cooperation against
extremist groups like Al-Qaida, ISIL, JeM, LeT, D Company and their
affiliates.
3. Pakistan to bring to justice perpetrators
of Mumbai 2008 and Pathankote 2016 attacks.
4.
Identify new areas of collaboration through the Counterterrorism Joint
Working Group.
4. Finalised arrangement to share
terrorist screening information.
5.
Affirmed support for UN Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism.
|
1. Calling terrorism a “global scourge”,
the statement resolved that US and India will fight it together.
2. Strengthen cooperation against
terrorist groups like Al-Qaida, ISIS, JeM, LeT, D-Company, and their
affiliates.
3. India appreciated US designation of
the Hizb-ul-Mujahideen leader as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist
(SDGT).
4. Called on Pakistan to “ensure that
its territory is not used to launch terrorist attacks on other countries.”
5. Further called on Pakistan to “bring
to justice the perpetrators of the 26/11 Mumbai, Pathankot, and other
cross-border terrorist attacks perpetrated by Pakistan-based groups.”
6.
Affirmed support for UN Comprehensive Convention on International
Terrorism.
|
Afghanistan
|
1. Importance of both strategic
partnerships with Afghanistan.
2. Continue consultations and cooperation
on the future of Afghanistan.
|
1. Promote a secure, stable, and
prosperous Afghanistan.
2. Reaffirmed the importance of both
strategic partnerships with Afghanistan.
3. Would continue high-level
consultations on Afghanistan in the near future.
|
No
mention of Afghanistan.
|
1. Trump welcomed India’s role in
Afghanistan’s stability, prosperity, and security. 2. Reaffirmed the
importance of both strategic partnerships with Afghanistan.
3. Committed to continue close
consultations and cooperation on future of Afghanistan.
|
Regional
connectivity
|
Must accelerate infrastructure
connectivity and develop corridors for regional economic integration.
|
Specifically cited need to stabilise
Afghanistan, through transport and economic connectivity between South and
Central Asia.
|
No
mention of regional connectivity
|
US supports construction of regional
connectivity “while ensuring respect for sovereignty, territorial integrity,
rule of law and environment.”
|
North
Korea
|
Concerns over North Korea’s development of
nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles. Urged North Korea to denuclearize.
|
Concerns over North Korea’s development of
nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles. Urged North Korea to denuclearize.
|
No
mention of North Korea
|
1. Strongly condemned “continued
provocations” by North Korea, which poses “a grave threat to regional
security and global peace.”
2. Pledged to together counter North
Korea’s weapons of mass destruction.
3. Will hold accountable “all parties
that support these programs”. (China)
|
International
regimes
|
Work towards India’s phased entry into
the NSG, MTCR, the Wassenaar Arrangement and Australia Group.
|
Work towards India’s phased entry into
the NSG, MTCR, the Wassenaar Arrangement and Australia Group.
|
1.
Looked forward to India’s imminent MTCR entry.
2. The US called on NSG members to
support India when its membership application comes up at the NSG Plenary in
June.
3. US also re-affirmed support for
India’s early membership of the Australia Group and Wassenaar Arrangement.
|
1. US strongly supported India’s early
membership in NSG, Wassenaar Arrangement, and the Australia Group.
2. Reaffirmed US support for India’s
permanent membership of a reformed UN Security Council.
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
DTTI: Defence Trade and Technology Initiative
In Modi’s three meetings with Obama, the
joint statements – which can be assumed to mention higher priorities ahead of
lesser preoccupations – all led off with economic growth and clean energy. Lower
priority was accorded to defence, homeland security and terrorism.
In Monday’s joint statement the order of
priority was: partnership in the Indo-Pacific, terrorism cooperation, strategic
cooperation, free and fair trade and, finally, energy.
While the Indo-Pacific partnership was
dealt with at some length, and the statement called on “regional countries” to
uphold freedom of navigation, it avoided mention of either China or the South
China Sea. This would not be the first time such a reference was dropped; the
June 2016 joint statement too had no such mention.
Shashank Joshi of the Royal United Service
Institute assesses: “The Trump administration has walked a fine line
on the issue, to avoid jeopardising Chinese support over North Korea.”
Previous joint statements unreservedly back
infrastructure creation for Asian regional connectivity, but Trump has backed
India’s opposition to China’s landmark Belt and Road Initiative (BRI),
especially the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). Hewing to New Delhi’s
line that the CPEC violates India’s sovereignty over Gilgit-Baltistan, which is
a part of J&K, the joint statement supports regional connectivity “while
ensuring respect for sovereignty, territorial integrity, rule of law and
environment.”
On terrorism, the US has supported India
with a clearly tougher line. Leading up to the summit, the US State Department
designated Hizbul-Mujahideen chief, Syed Salahuddin a Specially Designated
Global Terrorist. Monday’s joint statement saw the unprecedented mention of
“cross-border terrorist attacks perpetrated by Pakistan-based groups.”
Monday also saw Washington supporting an
Indian role in Afghanistan far more unequivocally than in previous summits.
Earlier, Washington pandered to Islamabad’s concerns, which feared that New
Delhi was “outflanking” it in Kabul. Pakistan, therefore, arm-twisted Washington
into keeping India away, dangling the carrot of its influence over the Taliban
and Haqqani Network that were fighting coalition forces in Afghanistan.
New Delhi, in turn, allowed in far stronger
language on North Korea, which currently is one of Trump’s top priorities. In
April, the Modi government had enforced sanctions on North Korea, as its
second-largest trading partner. But, here too, the joint statement took a shot
at China, noting that “all parties that support these (North Korean) programs”
would be held accountable.
In defence, the statement spoke of
deepening cooperation between the “major defence partners”, and the unprecedented
US offer of Sea Guardian unmanned aerial systems. The agreement for sharing
“White Shipping” data, which relates to commercial liners plying the Indian
Ocean, was proposed to be expanded.
Ajai,
ReplyDeleteAs one who has no inclination to study diplomatic nuances, I am impressed at the analytical detail you have packed into this article. I could not write a comparable one in a lifetime.
I know you will think me unsophisticated, but being a simple peasant from Gujranwala and from Iowa, all I can say is Modi-Trump talk the talk, but do they walk the walk? Having lived through the Nehru era, and being US trained, I have a great distrust of talk. Indians with their Bhramanical logic and Americans with their legal logic strike me as equally untrustworthy when they "talk, talk, you worry me to death." (This is from a popular song before you were born.)
I don't even understand what M and T are talking about. Clearly, the US wants us as the junior ally in the balance of power against China. Clearly, as we always have since 1947, we want the US to protect, defend, and help us without giving the US anything in return.
We are both completely messed up countries. In an ideal world I would want the US to go home and straighten out America, and I would want India to straighten itself out.
I just don't see what this summit contributes to either country.
Though I must admit it was hilarious when Modi kept his eyes on the ground like a good Indian woman and refused to look at the tempting Melania, who looks him straight in the eye. Bit of a role reversal here.
Isn't Gujranwala in Pakistan? :O
Delete