By Ajai
Shukla
Business Standard, 24th March 17
The
state-controlled Chinese media has sharply criticised the commissioning of Japan’s
powerful new warship, which has the same name --- Kaga --- as one of the
Imperial Japanese Navy’s aircraft carriers in World War II.
The
original Kaga, which Beijing’s English language daily, Global Times, terms a
“notorious warship”, was sunk by the US Navy in the Battle of Midway in 1942.
With
Japanese Ship (JS) Kaga’s rebirth on Wednesday as a “helicopter destroyer”,
Japan now has Asia’s only navy with two aircraft carrier-sized warships --- the
Kaga and its predecessor, JS Izumo. The 248 metre-long Kaga is larger than the
Indian Navy’s recently decommissioned carrier, INS Viraat.
Additionally,
Japan also operates two smaller helicopter destroyers, JS Haga and JS Ise,
which are about the same weight class as the “Harrier carriers” that served the
Italian, Spanish and Thai navies.
Beijing
would also have noted last fortnight’s commissioning of Japan’s eighth
Soryu-class submarine --- a massive 4,100-tonne vessel with air independent
propulsion that many consider the world’s finest conventional submarine. With
11 older Oyashio-class submarines already in the fleet, Japan would have 23
submarines by 2021, when all 12 Soryu-class vessels are delivered.
Yet, the Japanese
government, headed by the avowedly nationalist Shinzo Abe, still calls its navy
the Japanese Maritime Self Defence Force (JMSDF). However, with China
aggressively enforcing claims to disputed islands and waters in the Sea of
Japan, East China Sea and South China Sea, Tokyo is gradually dropping the
pretence.
Reuters has
reported that JS Izumo will shortly lead a JMSDF naval task force on a
three-month tour of the South China Sea, which the news agency terms the
“biggest show of naval power in foreign waters in more than 70 years.”
JS Kaga,
like its forerunner, JS Izumo, currently has a compliment of just nine
helicopters. However, each vessel can embark 28 small, or 14 large aircraft.
The helicopter carriers are not fitted with catapults or ski jumps for
launching fixed wing fighters, but they could function as aircraft carriers by
embarking vertical take-off fighters like the F-35B Lightening II.
Tokyo has a
contradictory position on the use of military force. Its pacifist constitution,
imposed on a defeated Japan by a victorious US after World War II, explicitly
renounces war. It limits Japan’s defence spending to just one per cent of Gross
Domestic Product (GDP) and prohibits it from acquiring offensive weapons
platforms like aircraft carriers (helicopter carriers are passed off as
defensive platforms).
On the
other hand, the US today sees Japan as an ally against a resurgent China. Washington
backs unapologetically nationalist leaders like Abe, who argue for shedding the
US-imposed restraint. When President Donald Trump argued for allies like Japan
to bear more of the cost of their defence he was, in effect, arguing for
scuppering Japan’s one per cent spending cap.
Yet the
JMSDF, despite its spending restraints, is widely considered Asia’s most
powerful navy, even beating out China. Even with the one per cent spending cap,
Japan has announced a defence budget for 2017 of $43.6 billion, only marginally
smaller than India’s $53.5 billion.
Unlike
India and China, Japan’s army does not consume the bulk of the budget --- the
navy and air force do. In contrast, India’s navy was allocated just 14 per cent
and the air force 22 per cent of the defence budget.
Furthermore,
Japan’s sophisticated shipbuilding industry, including giants like Kawasaki
Heavy Industries and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, churn out warships fast and
cheaply. Japan’s latest defence budget reveals they will build a new
Soryu-class submarine for $685 million (India’s Scorpene submarines, less than
half the Soryu’s size, cost about the same). Japan is building a 690-tonne,
Awaji-class ocean minesweeper for just $160 million, and has budgeted $210
million for a 2,900-tonne Hibiki-class ocean surveillance ship.
For over a
decade, the US has cajoled India and Tokyo into closer naval cooperation. Last
year, Japan formally became a participant in the annual Malabar naval exercise,
making it a US-India-Japan trilateral exercise.
There are
bilateral proposals between New Delhi and Tokyo for the supply of Japanese
defence equipment to India --- a touchy subject, given Japan’s constitution. On
the table is the Japanese maritime sea-plane, the US-2; and the Soryu
submarine.
"The 248 metre-long Kaga is larger than the Indian Navy’s INS Vikramditya"
ReplyDeleteThat is wrong statement.
INS Vikramaditya
General characteristics
Class and type: Modified Kiev-class aircraft carrier
Displacement: 45,400 tons of loaded displacement[6][7]
Length: 283.5 metres (930 ft) (overall)
Beam: 59.8 metres (196 ft)[8]
Draught: 10.2 metres (33 ft)
https://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwicgNbZ6-7SAhWBRo8KHQC8BwgQFggZMAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FINS_Vikramaditya&usg=AFQjCNGGSZ--UfWavbmubJj-RIQlToIrVw
Perhaps you were referring to INS Viraat?
Yes he has referred to Viraat
DeleteI do not think you can compare indua and japan in defence . Both absolute numbers and break up by service will be different.
ReplyDeleteThe cost of soryu submarine dhows that lower per unit cost dies not mean lower total cost !
Another article from you that is more political than military in content.
You could have written about technical specifications of the ship !
INS Vikram has 283.5 meters length, 60 meters beam,10 meters draught, while JS Izumo class has 248 meters length, 38 meters beam and 7 meters draught. Vikram is 45,400 ton at full load while Izumo is 27,000 ton at max load.
ReplyDeletePray tell me Shooklaw..in what way.Izumo is bigger than Vikram?
"(India’s Scorpene submarines, less than half the Soryu’s size, cost about the same)"
ReplyDeleteConsidering the low labour cost in India and the lack of safety procedures and associated spend on it and all those savings if the costs are equal, then a lot of palms have been greased.
Chalta hai...India hai..sab chalta hai..
Mr ajai sir,please post details about ushus2 and other submarine related sensors developed in india,
ReplyDeletealso tell about the submarine grade steel used in scorpene sub or not?
@ Anonymous 15:10
ReplyDeleteThanks for pointing out the error... I was indeed referring to INS Viraat. Correction made.