After operating British and
Russian carriers for decades, navy looks to US design
Ajai Shukla
Business Standard, 6th March 17
The navy on Monday decommissioned Indian
Navy Ship (INS) Viraat, the world’s oldest aircraft carrier, 58 years after she
entered operational service with the Royal Navy in 1959. During this period,
she has sailed over a million kilometres, enough to circumnavigate the world 27
times.
As per centuries-old naval practice, the
decommissioning was formally completed when two flags --- the Viraat’s
commissioning pennant, and the naval ensign --- were lowered at sunset today in
Mumbai.
Highlighting the nostalgia around the
decommissioning, all but one of the carrier’s 22 Indian commanding officers attended
the ceremony.
As a mark of respect, the Royal Navy’s
First Sea Lord (navy chief), Admiral Sir Philip Jones, also attended the
decommissioning.
The 28,000 tonne aircraft carrier was first
commissioned into the United Kingdom’s Royal Navy as HMS (Her Majesty’s Ship) Hermes
in 1959. The highlight of her 26 years in British service was the Falklands
War, when she served as the flagship of the Royal Navy task force in the
Southern Atlantic.
Three years after the Falklands War, she
was decommissioned in 1985. After two years of refit in Devon Shipyard, she was
commissioned as INS Viraat into the Indian Navy, eventually serving another 30
years.
Symbolising a bygone era, INS Viraat was
the navy’s last British-built warship. The Royal Navy established and trained
the modern Indian Navy, which British admirals commanded till April 21, 1958.
Up to the 1970s, the UK supplied India’s first modern warships, including its
first aircraft carrier, INS Vikrant, and six Leander class frigates.
In the 1980s began decades of Russian
affiliation, when India bought dozens of cheap Russian missile corvettes and
its first destroyers, the Rajput class. As Indian designers began building the
first indigenous warships, including the Godavari class frigates, Russian
influence was evident in their design. Meanwhile, the navy continued buying
Russian warships, such as the six Talwar-class frigates and the navy’s current
flagship --- INS Vikramaditya (formerly Admiral Gorshkov).
Currently, India is building its next
carrier, also named INS Vikrant, at Cochin Shipyard Ltd (CSL), Kochi. This
40,000 tonne vessel, which has been delayed by almost a decade, is likely to be
commissioned in 2023.
Beyond the British and Russian strands
interwoven into the navy’s equipment profile and the strong drive towards
indigenisation evident today, its future in aircraft carriers appears
increasingly linked with America.
The navy has decided that INS Vishal, the
65,000-tonne indigenous aircraft carrier that will follow INS Vikrant, must be
a technologically cutting-edge warship with numerous American features. These
include nuclear propulsion and the new US “electro-magnetic aircraft launch
system” (EMALS) that makes it possible to quickly launch different types of
combat aircraft that would provide a major combat edge.
Given the US Navy’s pre-eminent reputation
as the premier operator of carrier borne air power, New Delhi is consulting
closely with Washington on designing INS Vishal. A “joint working group” that
discusses design aspects is amongst the most successful cooperative enterprises
between the two militaries.
The navy wants at least 55 aircraft on
board INS Vishal, including two squadrons of fighters, electronic warfare (EW)
aircraft to mask them in combat, airborne early warning (AEW) aircraft to
monitor and control airspace, and helicopters for special operations,
anti-submarine warfare and communications duties.
After earlier supporting the indigenous
Tejas fighter for its aircraft carriers, and also the Russian MiG-29K/KUB, the
navy has now switched to backing the American F/A-18E/F Super Hornet, which
Boeing has offered to build in India. Choosing US carrier-borne fighters would further
tighten design and operational cooperation with America.
The future of the decommissioned Viraat
remains uncertain. Unless a buyer emerges in the next four months, or the
Andhra Pradesh government makes good on its offer to convert it into a floating
naval museum, the Viraat will head to the ship-breakers and sold as scrap.
Alternatively, NDTV quotes the navy chief,
Admiral Sunil Lanba, as indicating that the warship may be sunk and converted
into a divers’ destination.
It is very expensive to covert INS Virat into an interesting Naval Musium and then maintain it in impeccable manner. One ould not even earn it's upkeep as a tourist destination. So, this leaves us with two options. Either to scrap the vessel or to sink the ship in an interesting, well chosen spot and turn it into a super divers' destination. In this, I believe, Admiral Lanba's suggestion is absolutely ideal.
ReplyDeleteAs Goa is a great tourist destination, it will be ideal to sink the vessel in an easy to reach spot close to Goa to make it an excellent divers' destination. In doing so, one must consider if some islands can afford weather protection to the diving site.
I personally believe tejas would be great plane and a winner because of its small size , composite airframe with Y ducts and with a strong electronic package particularly particularly AESA radar and that too has GaN elements and full sensor fusion and very modern electronic warfare package would kill the so called fifth generation fighters. My only concern is it's radius of action and range and somehow make some room to accommodate six thousand liters and keep a good T/W ratio with a powerful 414 EPE engine. The advantage is it can then carry six AAM on multitrack pyelons and decent bombload and meet the range criteria I suggested twin engined LCA mk3 . The problem with Russian planes is after the fall of Soviet Union Russia could not keep pace with latest engine technology and thus they have multiple unreliable planes with faulty engines and nor does Russia have carrier technology. By now Indian navy must have understood that buying groshkov was not a get deal and they are in trouble and Russia is struggling to keep carrier operations in Syria. Russians do have good technology in submarines but in carriers they are way behind. China is also struggling with carrier technology and it is important that the security umbrella has to be improved with range of protective missiles must be increased to more that 300 Kms. And a missile should drop the torpedo very nerdy the submarine so the tarpedo can kill the sub. There should be shorter range electro optic controlled accurate missile as a second line defense plus a powerful laser gun as a third line of defense.
ReplyDeleteTIMBAKTOO