Finance Minister Arun Jaitley outside parliament with the customary briefcase holding the budget speech he will soon deliver
By Ajai Shukla
Business Standard, 2nd Feb 17
On the face of it, the government has hiked
defence allocations by Rs 14,748 crore, with the current year’s revised
estimates (RE) of Rs 345,106 crore enhanced to Rs 359,854 crore in the coming
year. That modest rise of 3.5 per cent is well below the inflation level.
Inclusive of pension, the defence budget accounts
for 16.8 per cent of government spending in 2017-18, which will be 2.14 per
cent of the Gross Domestic Product. This figure is down from 17.1 per cent of
spending and 2.29 per cent of GDP this year.
The drop comes despite the significantly
increased salary outgo expected in the coming year, once the recommendations of
the 7th Central Pay Commission are implemented. Added to the
increased pension bill triggered last year by the implementation of the One
Rank, One Pension formula, the 1.6 million-strong military’s manpower bill will
account for over half the defence allocation.
As has become the norm over the last 15
years, the capital budget --- which pays for new equipment and force
modernisation --- has been dressed up for the budget party. While apparently
increased by Rs 7,281 crore, from Rs 79,207 crore this year to Rs 86,488 crore in
2017-18, about a nine per cent hike, this has been achieved by under-spending
the current year’s capital allocation.
The Rs 86,189 crore capital budget
allocation this year, is scaled down in the revised estimates to Rs 79,207
crore, which means the defence ministry has underspent its equipment
modernisation budget by almost Rs 7,000 crore, some 8 per cent of its
allocation.
Defence allocations from 2015-16
2015-16 (Actual)
|
2016-17
(BE)
|
2016-17 (RE)
|
2017-18 (BE)
|
|
Ministry of Defence (MoD)*
|
11828
|
13060
|
15612
|
14852
|
Revenue
budget (Army)**
|
100175
|
110314
|
114935
|
121027
|
Revenue
budget (Navy)
|
14992
|
17425
|
17814
|
18494
|
Revenue
budget (IAF)
|
21021
|
23656
|
23817
|
24803
|
Capital spend
(Army)
|
20602
|
26791
|
23709
|
25175
|
Capital spend
(Navy)
|
19875
|
22000
|
19596
|
19348
|
Capital spend
(IAF)
|
31198
|
29795
|
28210
|
33556
|
Total Capital
Budget^^
|
79846
|
86189
|
79207
|
86488
|
Ordnance Factory
Board (revenue)
|
422
|
1218
|
1432
|
1184
|
DRDO
(revenue)
|
5798
|
6728
|
6663
|
7266
|
Pensions
|
60238
|
82332
|
85626
|
85740
|
Total defence
allocation
|
294320
|
340922
|
345106
|
359854
|
Total government spending
|
1790783
|
1978060
|
2014407
|
2146735
|
Share of government spend
|
16.4%
|
17.2%
|
17.1%
|
16.8%
|
Total GDP
|
13675331
|
15065010
|
15075429
|
16847455
|
Share of GDP
|
2.15%
|
2.26%
|
2.29%
|
2.14%
|
* Includes budget for Border Roads
Organisation, Coast Guard
** Includes budget for Rashtriya Rifles and
National Cadet Corps
^^ Includes capital allocation for DRDO and Ordnance Factory Board (OFB)
The preceding year, 2015-16, was even more
worrying, with the defence ministry under-spending Rs 13,188 crore from its
capital budget, almost 14 per cent of the year’s allocation.
There is little to suggest that this year’s
allocation will be fully spent. With financial sanctions for procurement controlled
by civilian bureaucrats in the defence and finance ministries, the military’s
procurement officers openly complain that, towards the end of each financial
year, the bureaucrats place an informal block on most procurements, causing the
earmarked funds to lapse on March 31.
After the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)
manifesto promised to expedite procurements, the military hoped this might
change. However, the reverse has happened. Compared to the Rs 79,128 crore
spent on capital procurements in 2013-14, the last year of the United
Progressive Alliance government, the National Democratic Alliance spent Rs
80,884 crore in 2014-15; Rs 79,846 crore in 2015-16; and Rs 79,207 crore in
2016-17, according to the revised estimates.
“The capital budget has flat-lined, which
is inexplicable for a country that is growing at 7 per cent. We talk of
building military strength, but the reality comes home with every budget”, says
a senior general, talking anonymously.
India’s fledgling defence companies, which
are critically dependent on stepped up procurement, are similarly unenthused. Says
Rahul Chaudhary, who heads Tata Power (Strategic Engineering Division), a
company that is at the forefront of defence indigenisation: “The meagre rise in
the capital outlay is inadequate for a country with active borders and a
two-front threat. India is spending even less on defence that some NATO
countries that face no security threats.
In contrast, micro, small and medium
enterprises (MSMEs) in defence are welcoming the tax rebate of 5 per cent
available to qualifying companies. “The tax rate reduction will lead to greater
development of MSMEs and increased participation in defence”, says Puneet
Kaura, chief of Samtel Avionics.
While the 1.3 million-strong army faces
active counter-insurgency operations and mans a hostile border round the year,
its procurement allocation of Rs 25,175 crore for the coming year is
significantly lower than that of the Indian Air Force (IAF), which will get Rs
33,556 crore.
Service-wise budgetary
allocation
Service
|
Revenue
|
Capital
|
Total
|
Revenue-to-Capital Ratio
|
Army
|
121027
|
25175
|
146202
|
82 : 18
|
Navy
|
18494
|
19348
|
37842
|
48 : 52
|
Air Force
|
24803
|
33556
|
58359
|
42 : 58
|
The army, which only recently sign its
first contract for critically needed helmets for soldiers, finds itself
struggling to provide basic equipment like rifles, bulletproof jackets and
helmets. Only 18 per cent of the army’s budget goes on new equipment, compared
to 52 per cent of the navy’s and 58 per cent of the IAF’s budget.
The political focus, however, remains on
providing sops, rather than equipment. The finance minister had nothing to say
on equipment modernisation in his budget speech, mentioning instead a
“Centralised Defence Travel System” that the government had set up to allow
soldiers to book railway tickets on-line. With soldiers often travelling on
leave without reservations, such a facility is likely to be welcomed.
================
Has the Govt. given the go-ahead to the AMCA project? Have any funds been earmarked in the budget for development of prototypes?
ReplyDeleteJust like railway accidents can simply not be reduced without allocating extra money to Rlys specifically ( 1 lakh crore corpus over 5 years announced in this budget), life losses in army can not be reduced without a similar measure. Our chaps simply don't have a good chance- active or passive - of surviving a bullet.The only difference is that life losses in army is simply not a problem for Indians. So, the politicians don't care and nor does the army.
ReplyDeleteWhen money is not spent then why increase the budget?
ReplyDeleteThere is no point in increasing the defence capital budget without structural improvements in the MOD. best example is the contradiction in your article itself. why increase when you are not able to spend?? this is bizarre logic. we must learn to exhaust the full capital budget and then ask for more as all finance ministers have stated that anytime more funds are required they will be allocated.
ReplyDeletetake the case of Rafale - it took 18 months to close the deal from the time PM announced it, that's the fastest we ever have done to close a large deal and that too the PM got involved!! look at the track record of this govt in the last 2.5yrs - MCMV, L&T K9, LPD, Ka-226, P-75i, carbines, sr-sams, vshorad, mmrca etc etc the list is huge and these all indicate that contracts are in limbo for years. with the present set-up you cannot predict how many deals you can close and when you will sign them and without that info, how can you even estimate the capex for the year. hence everyone takes the tried and tested route of a nominal 7-10% increase and that's about it.
I always say we need a well equipped military with lesser military personnel. We need around 10 lacks military personnel. We need to reduce it immediately
ReplyDeleteWhy compare apples to oranges? If there has been a RE stage every year, so will there be one this time as well. Focus on substance.
ReplyDeleteThere is more bad news in the offing, the present def minister is dying to return to goa so this ministry could well be left neglected as has been the case for the last 70 years.
ReplyDeleteBy the way, are you planning to cover the Aero India 2017?
There could be a couple of reasons for this
ReplyDelete1 the rate at which deals are decided. Today it takes a long time though Rafake was double quick by previous standards. It still took 18-20 months from the time PM annouced it .
2 the increased indegina ation means more bang for buck. E.g artillery is off import list except Tracked and mountain. The assualt rifle (7.62x51) could be a local derivative of ghatak. That means import is limited to few tne thousand for anti insurgency operations.
3. Most big deals are done and are being paid for. We need to see what happens to P75I a, light helicopters and the 4 Russians ships.
It could also be the case that MOD wants to implement Shekatkar committees report and hence foresee savings which in turn would already have been factored in this years budget??
ReplyDelete