First time ever that Pak army
backs action against India-focused jihadis
By Ajai Shukla
Business Standard, 1st Feb 17
A day after Pakistan’s government arrested
Hafiz Saeed, chief of the banned Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT), along with four
associates and issued orders against the Jamaat-ud-Dawa (JuD) and its
humanitarian aid front, the Falah-e-Insaniyet Foundation; the Pakistani street
is abuzz with speculation about what motivated this crackdown.
Pakistani government sources discreetly
suggest that Saeed was detained to insulate Pakistanis from President Donald
Trump’s order banning non-US travellers from seven Islamic countries from
entering the United States, and a follow-up suggestion from his Chief of Staff,
Reince Priebus, that this could be extended to Pakistan.
In contrast, Saeed flatly accuses Pakistan of
succumbing to Indian pressure.
“This is taking place because of [Prime
Minister Narendra] Modi's insistence, Trump's pressure and Pakistan's
helplessness”, Saeed stated after his arrest, according to Reuters.
Even so, the Pakistan Army’s acquiescence
would have been essential for such a step. Earlier this month, Business
Standard quoted top Pakistan Army sources who revealed that the new army chief,
General Qamar Javed Bajwa, was readying to curb the LeT and Jaish-e-Mohammed
(JeM) in order to ease tensions with India (January 11, “Is Pakistan Army preparing to turn on LeT and Jaish”).
According to Pakistan’s Dawn newspaper, the army’s public
relations chief, Major General Asif Ghafoor, stated at a media briefing on
Tuesday: “This (Saeed’s arrest) is a policy decision that the state took in
[the] national interest. Lots of institutions will have to do their jobs.”
This was the first time the Pakistan Army
has publicly backed the arrest of India-focused jihadis, which it has long
regarded as “strategic assets”.
That raises the question: has Trump’s blockage
of Muslim travellers provided the Pakistani army and government with a
plausible reason to crack down on Saeed and the LeT, without making it appear
like India was being placated?
The action taken against Saeed, is stronger
than what the Pakistani media has painted. For years, Saeed operated freely and
openly in Pakistan, thumbing his nose at a $10 million bounty that Washington offers
for information leading to his arrest, and being the star speaker at public
rallies that whip up hatred of India. Now, unexpectedly, he is detained under
Pakistan’s stern Anti-Terrorist Act of 1997.
Nor is the LeT chief under “house arrest” as
the media has erroneously noted. True, Saeed is at home in Lahore, but this has
been notified a sub-jail. He is under full arrest for activities that “harm
peace and security” of Pakistan.
This is significantly different from being
arrested for acting again India, or sending militants into Kashmir, all of which
are perceived as legitimate activities in Pakistan. When Saeed was placed under
home arrest after the LeT struck Mumbai on 26/11 [2008], the widespread impression
across Pakistan that this was at New Delhi’s behest ensured the terrorist chief
was released within six months.
This time round, there was a markedly
different feel to Saeed’s arrest. On Monday, when he was taken into custody
from Markaz Al-Qadsia, the JuD headquarters in Lahore, four key associates were
simultaneously picked up from across Punjab, reports the credible Pakistani
newspaper, The Express Tribune.
Indicating a centrally directed, geographically
dispersed crackdown, two associates --- Zafar Iqbal and Abdul Rehman Abid ---
were arrested from Markaz Tayyaba, the LeT headquarters at Muridke. A third, Abdullah
Ubaid, was picked up in Faisalabad; while a fourth, Kashif Niazi, was arrested
in Multan.
To nobody’s surprise, New Delhi has taken a
sceptical view of Saeed’s arrest. On Tuesday, the MEA stated: “We have seen
reports on the Pakistan Ministry of Interior order placing the Jamaat-ud-Dawa
and the Falah–e-Insaniyet Foundation under the watchlist (sic) and also the
notification under which the Falah-e-Insaniyet Foundation has been included in
the second schedule of their anti terror legislation under United Nations
Security Council Resolution No. 1267.”
“Exercises such as yesterday’s orders
against Hafiz Saeed and others have been carried out by Pakistan in the past
also. Only a credible crack down on the mastermind of the Mumbai terrorist
attack and terrorist organizations involved in cross border terrorism would be
proof of Pakistan’s sincerity”, said the MEA.
Analysts say quiet scepticism from New
Delhi would create a better climate for the government of Pakistan to act
against jihadi groups than overt triumphalism, or breast beating by the Indian
media. For now, a rampaging Trump has provided the necessary cover. It remains
to be seen whether Indian politicians, in an election season, can display
restraint and provide Pakistan with the space to act.
New Delhi sources are now watching
carefully for renewed progress in Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi’s trial for the Mumbai
26/11 attack.
Its nothing but a drama. Sitting in home arrest hafiz is going to father half a dozen kids.
ReplyDeletethis is all because of deft diplomacy of modi govt, they learnt from their past mistakes and did a good job in getting in touch with new usa govt. now indian army must get in touch with pak army and ensure that peace prevails all along the borders, we can't leave it to politicians as we did in the past.
ReplyDeleteWhen you get up in the morning say 5 times, "A leopard never changes its spots."
ReplyDeleteDuplicity is the name of the game...enough said.
ReplyDeletebakwaas blog
ReplyDeletenothing informative def related...........lots of things happening , atags, dhanush , lca mk1a, lca foc, amca....
all falthu analysis on politics, rotten brainchild
On political matter for once I agree, the chest beating should stop, suspect, quietly and with pointed statements where needed, make this look as it should be always a collective decision and state machinery responding as needed. Stop responding to even our own opposition, Media has a responsibility too, no talk shows no debate, just wait and watch, just report what is being said and keep quite saying we have to wait and watch, don't try to provoke or entice Politicians to provide any input at all.
ReplyDeleteIn the interest of the Nation. What ever Pakistans intentions let the story develop.
Thanks Col.