Competitive selection
proposed, to avoid “nomination” of private firms
By Ajai Shukla
Business Standard, 26th Nov 16
The army has issued a Request for
Information (RFI), inviting Indian industry to respond to a proposal for manufacturing
ammunition in the country.
“The purpose of the RFI is to facilitate
preparation of Request for Proposal (RFP) and identify prospective
manufacturers for participating in the proposal for indigenous manufacture of
ammunition”, says the document, which is posted on the government’s Central
Public Procurement Portal.
The RFI, and the forthcoming RFP, highlights
the difficulties faced by the ministry of defence (MoD) in identifying “strategic
partners” (SPs) --- private firms designated as the preferred production
agencies for manufacturing various categories of defence equipment like
aircraft, warships, submarines, ammunition and others.
So contentious has been the formulation of
a MoD policy for identifying “strategic partners” that the Defence Procurement
Policy of 2016 (DPP-2016) was issued earlier this year without a Chapter 6 ---
which was to be the strategic partner policy. It remains a blank space in the
DPP to this day.
Private sector defence firms, which regard
being nominated as a strategic partner an essential first step to entering the
lucrative defence business, have competed fiercely to mould the policy to suit
their own candidatures. Adding to the difficulty has been bureaucratic reluctance
to nominate strategic partners --- because of concern over future allegations
of bias, and the possibility of getting embroiled in investigations.
Now, after discussions at the Prime
Minister’s Office (PMO), the MoD has chosen to bypass the issue of nominating
strategic partners for manufacturing ammunition. Instead there is the
appearance of competition, involving the issue of an RFI and RFP.
Yet, the RFI contains a strategic
partner-style, long-term component, that says: “The ammunition is proposed to
be procured under a long term contract over a period of first 10 years…
Subsequent extensions after 10 years will be decided, negotiated and contracted
based on requirement of the Army as determined after performance of the
supplier over the initial ten years of supplies.”
Further, “It is proposed that the
manufacturer should develop the infrastructure and absorb the complete [Transfer
of Technology] for manufacture of ammunition within two years from signing of
contract.” For this, there will be no government funding.
The RFI covers almost most type of
ammunition, except for small arms, from 23-millimetre rounds for air defence
guns to 155-millimetre artillery gun ammunition. India’s military faces a
serious shortage of ammunition, with stocks catering for just 20 days of
intense battle, only half of the 40 days of battle stock that planners have
mandated. The MoD has assessed that ammunition worth Rs 19,000 crore is needed
to make up this deficit.
The RFI clearly weighs in favour of large
private firms, with financial criteria that excludes many medium-scale private
companies that have manufactured and supplied ammunition, and its components,
for decades.
Companies eligible to participate must have
a consolidated turnover of at least Rs 200 crore for each of the last three
financial years; capital assets at gross book value of Rs 100 crore; revenue
growth of at least five per cent in at least three of the preceding five
financial years, and a minimum credit rating equivalent to CRISIL/ICRA “A”.
Small and medium sector company executives
have already protested their exclusion from the contract, with at least one
letter directly addressed to Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar.
Companies like Sandeep MetalCraft,
Indo-Swiss Time, Micron Instruments, Premier Explosives and Polar, which have decades-long
records of supplying high-technology components like electronic fuzes for
artillery shells, find themselves left out of even smaller contracts, which
could all flow to the selected large-scale vendors.
“Does the MoD realize that its policy
deliberately excludes small and medium scale enterprises (SMEs), while the
prime minister’s policy is to build up SMEs?” asks one chief executive officer
(CEO), speaking off the record.
“I could understand the MoD’s reluctance to
award a contract worth several thousand crore to a medium-scale industry. But
we have been winning smaller contracts of up to Rs 150 crore, and supplying
them reliably, even to international customers. Now, these guidelines will
render us ineligible”, another says.
These apprehensions will be voiced at an
“industry interaction” that the MoD has scheduled for December 9 in New Delhi.
Vendors are required to respond to the RFI by December 16.
The RFI stipulates tough conditions to
safeguard the supply of ammunition from subsequent technology denial, and to
allow for the “surge manufacture” needed in wartime. It mandates that “the
manufacturer will ensure continuous availability of minimum one year’s stock of
ex-import components during first two years after signing of contract or 100%
indigenisation, whichever is earlier. In case full indigenization is either not
possible or not proposed, the manufacturer from third year onwards will have to
hold two year’s stock of ex-import content at all times.”
Private firm CEOs point out that
maintaining one/two years of ex-import stock would be a heavy financial
liability, for which they assume the MoD would compensate them.
The proposal for nominating private sector
strategic partners was mooted by the MoD-constituted Dhirendra Singh Committee
in 2014-15. Subsequently, the VK Aatre Task Force recommended designating one
private sector strategic partner (SP) for each of seven technology areas ---
aircraft; helicopters; aero engines; submarines; warships; guns and artillery,
and armoured vehicles. It also recommended that three other technology areas
--- metallic material and alloys; non-metallic materials; and ammunition,
including smart munitions --- have two strategic partners each designated.
Horrible State of Affairs! The bureaucracy comes up with ridiculous ideas such as Strategic partners, mindless selection criteria even for making ammunition. Maybe they can import some ammo and rifles and shoot themselves in the foot as many times as they like.
ReplyDeleteWhen war starts, maybe the soldiers should stage dharna at the MOD demanding ammo, or just go on strike.
The MoD shows an strange ability to turn even simple tasks such as making ammunition into 5 season soap operas. Defence manufacture should be exempt from corruption, red tape and ineptitude, or else the consequences are too severe to comtemplate. India faces an existential threat, to which the people of the country are totally unaware, but is clearly evident to those in the West. In these times, MoD's theatrics are beyond inexcusable. Hey Ram.
ReplyDeleteMOD needs to be practical in their approach and help indigenous R&D to develop Amn & Arms.The conditions shld be a level playing for all& not those wh suits only few on top.We need buffer stock and continuous supply during war time.We shld encourage all to develop and improve their capabilities
ReplyDelete