By Ajai Shukla
Philadelphia, US
Business Standard, 8th May 2016
1
|
India and
US to be “priority partners” in the Asia-Pacific
|
2
|
Text
finalised of logistics agreement (LEMOA)
|
3
|
Additional
defence agreements like CISMOA possible
|
4
|
High
technology sharing with “major defence partner” India
|
5
|
Additional
projects to be taken up under DTTI
|
6
|
US
cooperation for designing indigenous aircraft carrier
|
7
|
India to
assist in repatriating WWII US pilots’ remains
|
8
|
Counter
terrorism: arrangement for sharing information
|
9
|
US
support for India’s entry into global non-proliferation agreements, most
immediately Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG)
|
10
|
US
finance for six nuclear power projects; contracts by 2017
|
|
|
After Prime
Minister Narendra Modi’s discussion on Tuesday with US President Barack Obama
in Washington, a joint statement described what it billed as their “third major
bilateral summit”, after earlier meetings in September 2014 and January 2015.
The
statement noted a new military logistics agreement, made common cause in the
South China Sea, revealed growing American involvement in helping India build
an indigenous aircraft carrier, and announced additional co-development projects
for defence equipment. There is a new agreement for sharing terrorist-related
information. India will be buying six 1000MW nuclear power plants from
Toshiba-Westinghouse, with the contract to be signed in 2017. And Washington
has thrown its full weight behind India’s candidature for membership of the
Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG).
Asia-Pacific cooperation
US
officials privately lament New Delhi’s poor follow-up of strategic agreements.
This joint statement pins India down to specific action, announcing “a roadmap
for cooperation under the 2015 U.S.-India Joint Strategic Vision for the
Asia-Pacific and Indian Ocean Region, which will serve as a guide for
collaboration in the years to come.”
In a subtly-worded
statement that takes the US-India partnership beyond the 2014 Vision Statement
and 2015 Declaration of Friendship, Modi and Obama “resolved that the United
States and India should look to each other as priority partners in the
Asia-Pacific and the Indian Ocean region.”
The leaders
also welcomed last month’s inaugural meeting of the US-India Maritime Security
Dialogue, which was instituted in April during US Defense Secretary Ashton
Carter’s visit to New Delhi.
In an
indicator last week that New Delhi was shifting closer to Washington in its
confrontation with China in the South China Sea, Defence Minister Manohar
Parrikar, speaking at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, had hardened his
tone against China’s unilateralism and bellicosity.
The long expected
announcement about a US-India logistic agreement duly came, with the statement
noting “the finalization of the text of the Logistics Exchange Memorandum of
Agreement (LEMOA).” The actual signing will take place shortly at a lower
official level.
Washington
will be delighted with an indication that New Delhi is open to other agreements,
such as the Communication and Information Security Memorandum of Agreement, which
it has so far resisted. The statement noted that Modi and Obama “expressed
their desire to explore agreements which would facilitate further expansion of
bilateral defense cooperation in practical ways.”
Defence technology
Washington
has promised to ease the transfer of defence technology to India, a pledge it
has made earlier in less explicit terms. The joint statement says: “United
States hereby recognizes India as a Major Defense Partner… The United States
will continue to work toward facilitating technology sharing with India to a
level commensurate with that of its closest allies and partners.”
Without
mentioning specifics, Modi and Obama said they had “reached an understanding
under which India would receive license-free access to a wide range of dual-use
technologies, in conjunction with steps that India has committed to take to
advance its export control objectives.”
The
statement also welcomes “the establishment of new DTTI [Defence Technology and
Trade Initiative] working groups to include agreed items covering Naval
Systems, Air Systems and other Weapons Systems.” During Obama’s 2015 visit to
India, four “pathfinder projects” were announced for co-developing systems, but
these have made little headway. It remains unclear what the new projects are,
or how they will be structured.
There are
clear indications that the Indian Navy has approached Washington for assistance
in building its second indigenous aircraft carrier. The joint statement
“announced the finalization of the text of an Information Exchange Annex under
the Joint Working Group on Aircraft Carrier Technology Cooperation.”
In another
announcement that will be welcomed in America, Modi told Obama he would support
the location and repatriation of bodies of World War II US pilots who crashed
in the Eastern Himalayas while flying supplies from Assam for Chiang Kai-Shek’s
Kuomintang forces fighting the Japanese in China. During Carter’s visit to
Delhi in April, one pilot’s remains were despatched to the US.
Counter-terrorism
Taking
the already close counter-terrorism cooperation forward, Modi and Obama
“applauded the finalisation of “an arrangement to facilitate the sharing of
terrorist screening information.”
The joint
statement also called for Pakistan to prosecute those behind the 2008 Mumbai
and 2016 Pathankot terrorist attacks.
India’s acceptance into NSG, MTCR
Highlighting
Washington’s strong support for India’s entry into the four global
non-proliferation agreements, the joint statement looked forward to “India’s
imminent entry into the Missile Technology Control Regime.” Further, the US
“re-affirmed its support for India’s early membership of the Australia Group
and Wassenaar Arrangement.”
The
statement said: “President Obama welcomed India’s application to join the
Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG), and re-affirmed that India is ready for
membership. The United States called on NSG Participating Governments to
support India’s application when it comes up at the NSG Plenary later this
month.”
Modi is
making a last-ditch attempt on his on-going five-country tour to marshal
support for India’s membership of the NSG from two reluctant members: Mexico
and Switzerland. At the end of his visit to Berne, Switzerland announced its
support. If Mexico too drops its resistance when Modi visits on Thursday, Obama
would urge China to not be the lone objector.
On UN
reform the statement affirmed support “for a reformed UN Security Council with
India as a permanent member… The leaders are committed to continued engagement
on Security Council reform in the UN Intergovernmental Negotiations (IGN on
Security Council Reform.”
Nuclear power generation
Billed as a
clean energy project that would fulfil “the promise of the U.S.-India civil
nuclear agreement”, Modi and Obama “welcomed the start of preparatory work on
site in India for six AP 1000 reactors to be built by Westinghouse and noted
the intention of India and the U.S. Export-Import Bank to work together toward
a competitive financing package for the project.”
The
statement referred to “the announcement by the Nuclear Power Corporation of
India Ltd and Westinghouse that engineering and site design work will begin
immediately and the two sides will work toward finalizing the contractual
arrangements by June 2017.”
Stating
that the US “supports the Government of India’s ambitious national goals to
install 175 GW of renewable power which includes 100 GW from solar power,” the
joint statement said the two countries would jointly launch an initiative for
off-grid solar energy at the founding conference of the International Solar
Alliance in India in September.
On membership of NSG, I myself fail to see why a country not a member of NPT should be allowed to get in there? To say that Indians are good people and hence must be trusted can hardly be a plank to break existing rules. Is that the way to run global affairs? And don't read too much in to America backing us. As long as they know that China will block it anyways, it makes good sense to get some Indian goodwill at no cost.
ReplyDeleteWonder how and why should the world should make a country specific exemption for India to join NSG, without NPT? Are we certified angels? As for American approval, it is smart of them to gain leverage with India by showing public approval, while knowing well that China would never let that happen. Smart move.
ReplyDeleteClears the way for F35
ReplyDelete@Alok
ReplyDeleteThere are separate rules for the weak and separate rules for the strong. It is extremely gullible on your part to think that rules apply to all uniformly.
1>NSG is a group where people decide not to sell stuff except among themselves.
ReplyDelete2>BARC has a lot that it can sell if it remains outside NPT.
3>NSG without NPT signature is as good as NPT signature.
4>Just remember who enabled this.
5>China will be more than happy to let us into NSG even without Pakistan.
6>Pakistan has nothing worthwhile to sell and Chinese know that.
7>Though everybody in NSG would like to have Pakis inside the tent pissing outside. Because Pakis can still supply 'rogue states that are a danger to world peace and democracy'.
8>GoI just have to say Khushamadeed sheikh chini and it will happen. Something the MoEA has been practicing for last 70 years.
Nearly all of this is just a drama to make it look like India needs NSG membership badly and the world did us a favour.
As fas as membership in the NSG is concerned, India needs only the Uranium for its nuclear power plants. As a quid-pro-quo obligation, its agreed to buy 6 Toshiba-Westinghouse reactors also.
ReplyDeleteHowever, in the medium-term, India must only rely on its indigenous PHWR reactors developed by Department of Atomic Energy (DaE) of 740 MW capacity each. After these are commissioned, these shall also be develoepd to 1,000 MW+ capacity, and India won't have to import foreign reactors.
Its once again a crying shame, that like the Armed Forces, India seeks to import nuclear reactors despite having one of the most robust nuclear programmes in the world; one that was developed under isolation of technology denials, sanctions and being a pariah.
I'm hoping that the Toshiba-Westinghouse deal is just quid-pro-quo only, and that India shall only commission indigenously built reactors in the future.