The US Army's Stryker combat vehicle. The ICV would serve the same purpose, as a tracked vehicle
By Ajai Shukla
Business Standard, 15th Feb 16
On Monday, ten Indian companies will submit
proposals to the defence ministry for designing, developing and manufacturing a
“future infantry combat vehicle” (FICV) ---
an armoured, tracked vehicle that will carry soldiers into battle.
A ministry team will choose the two best
proposals, while the public sector Ordnance Factory Board (OFB) gets a free
pass, being a defence ministry entity. These three development agencies (DAs)
will each develop an FICV prototype, with the defence ministry paying 80 per
cent of the cost. The best will be chosen and 2,600 FICVs built to that design
to replace the army’s ageing BMP-II ICV fleet.
The FICV is required to be amphibious, and
transportable in the air force’s IL-76 and C-17 aircraft. It must fire missiles
that destroy enemy tanks at ranges of 4,000 metres.
The ten firms that received Expressions of
Interest from the defence ministry on July 16, 2015 are --- Larsen & Toubro
(L&T); Tata Power (Strategic Engineering Division); Tata Motors; Mahindra
& Mahindra; Bharat Forge; Pipavav Defence; Rolta India; Punj Lloyd;
Titagarh Wagons and the OFB.
Business Standard learns these companies
have formed consortia between themselves, and tied up technology partnerships
with foreign vendors. In selecting the DAs, the defence ministry would evaluate
three parameters in their bid, namely technology levels; financial strength and
indigenisation capability. The selection process is likely to take about 12
months.
The major tie-ups between companies are
enumerated below.
The Tatas are not bidding as a group, although
Tata Group headquarters wanted Tata Motors to bid in partnership with Tata
Power (SED). However, after the defence ministry ruled that Tata Motors’
overseas income from Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) would not be countable towards the
financial strength of the company, Tata Power (SED) concluded that partnering
Tata Motors would hamstring its own bid.
Now Tata Motors is bidding in consortium
with Bharat Forge; and they have co-opted US major, General Dynamics (GD), as a
technology partner. Over the years, GD has built highly successful armoured
vehicles, including the US Army’s M-1 Abrams tank; and the Stryker ICV.
Meanwhile, Tata Power (SED) is going it
alone, having gained confidence from being selected as a DA in both the “Make”
projects already awarded --- the Tactical Communications System, and the
Battlefield Management System. In both these bids, it was in consortium with
L&T.
Tata Power (SED)’s strength lies in systems
integration. It will also benefit from its on-going collaboration with Korean
firm, Dusan, in a separate tender for building an armoured vehicle for a mobile
air defence system to replace the Russian Tangushka.
At the time of going to press, L&T was
still in negotiations with the Mahindras, trying to hammer out a joint bid,
which will incorporate technology from UK-based BAE Systems. L&T is already
partnering Korean firm, Samsung Heavy Engineering, for building the K-7
Thunder, self-propelled artillery gun, which will provide it access to armoured
vehicle technologies. L&T also has experience in designing the NAMICA (Nag
missile carrier) for the Defence R&D Organisation (DRDO).
The OFB, which has been granted automatic
nomination as a DA, has never designed an armoured vehicle. It has built the
T-90 and Arjun tanks, and the BMP-II, but only based on transferred technology
and manufacturing blueprints. Industry rumours indicate that several Israeli
firms have approached OFB and offered to entirely design the FICV, which the
OFB can then assemble at its factory in Medak.
The nine private firms are protesting this
favoured treatment, despite repeated defence ministry promises of a level
playing field. Private firms say the OFB’s assembly line at Medak should being
made available to the winning DA on a “government owned company operated”
(GOCO) basis. Instead of incurring the expenditure of a brand new assembly
line, the winning DA can pay to build the FICV at Medak.
It is learnt that the OFB had earlier
explored cooperation with Russia’s military export agency, Rosoboronexport, but
the army told OFB it “did not want a BMP-III”.
Each DA will spend an estimated Rs 1,000
crore in developing their prototype. Manufacturing 2,600 FICVs over about a
decade would cost another Rs 50,000 crore.
This “Make” project is being processed
under the Defence Procurement Policy of 2008. To be eligible, DPP-2008 mandates
that a company should have been registered for at least 10 years; have capital
assets in India of at least Rs 100 crore and a turnover greater than Rs 1,000
crore for each of the preceding three years, and a minimum credit rating
equivalent to CRISIL/ICRA “A”.
what about the TATA KESTREL?
ReplyDeleteWhere does that TATA DRDO joint offering stand here?
Dear Sir
ReplyDeleteWhat are your views on the Supreme Court Judgement on
COMMAND and EXIT policy
Are you satisfied with 141 posts for Colonels to be created for
The Other Combat Arms such as Armoured Corps and Mechanised Infantry
I would think GD Europe's assets (Piranha V, ASCOD/Ajax) are more relevant than US Army kit..."
ReplyDeleteLikewise, not sure why BMP3 in any guise would be considered the Russian offering, given the timescale of tender Kurganets would seem the obvious platform to offer and allow customization of etc...