By Ajai
Shukla
Business Standard, 16th Jan 16
In an
undisguised favour to the Ordnance Factory Board (OFB), the defence ministry
announced on Thursday that, while nine private sector companies would compete
to develop the future infantry combat vehicle (FICV), the OFB would be
nominated without competing as a third development agency. The FICV project is
worth an estimated Rs 50,000 crore.
The
ministry’s Expression of Interest (EoI), which invited ten companies on July
16, 2015 to submit proposals to develop the FICV under the “Make” procedure,
specified that two development agencies would be chosen. Now, even as that
competitive selection continues, the OFB has been given a free pass.
“Competent
Authority has approved the deviation to DPP-2008 for ‘Nomination of OFB and two
Indian Private Sector Industries to undertake design and development of FICV
prototypes (sic)”, said a defence ministry circular on Thursday. Business
Standard has reviewed the circular.
Ministry
insiders say this last-minute decision was taken because it was evident the OFB
would not be selected in a fair competitive process. To ensure the OFB participates,
the rules of the game have been unprecedentedly changed in the middle of the
game.
The decision
came just a day before the ten contestants were to submit their responses to
the EOI. The ministry circular stated: “In view of the above decision, the date
of submission of response to the EOI has been extended and now the EOI response
[may] be submitted by (noon) on 15 Feb 2016”.
Private
company executives who have priced their FICV bids say each company will spend
about Rs 1,000 crore in developing the prototype FICV, of which 80 per cent
will be reimbursed to them according to the “Make” procedure. By nominating the
OFB as a third development agency, the defence ministry is increasing the cost
of the project by about Rs 800 crore.
This step
is likely to evoke strong objections from the nine private companies in the
race --- Larsen & Toubro; Tata Power (Strategic Engineering Division); Tata
Motors; Mahindra & Mahindra; Bharat Forge; Pipavav Defence; Rolta India;
Punj Lloyd and Titagarh Wagons.
The last
time the defence ministry attempted to grant similar favour; it was forced to
step back. In 2009, it nominated defence public sector unit, Bharat Electronics
Ltd (BEL), to build the Tactical Communications System (TCS) under the “Make”
procedure. After strong objections from private defence companies, the TCS
project was competitively tendered.
Defence
Minister Manohar Parrikar has repeatedly promised, most recently in an
interview on November 25, that the private and public defence sectors would
compete on a level playing field. Private sector executives point to decisions
like this to underline the hollowness of this promise.
Under the “Make” procedure, the defence ministry will choose
the best two proposals. Those two companies, and the OFB, will design and
develop separate FICV prototypes. The defence ministry would reimburse 80 per
cent of their expenses. The best prototype will then be selected, and the
vendor that built it will get a manufacturing contract. About 2,600 FICVs will
be needed to replace the army’s old Russian-origin BMP-2 infantry combat vehicles.
This is bad, bad, bad, and a transparent attempt by the GoI to curry favour with the central unions. The 800 crore waste is bad enough, but the Government will then bend the results to give the contract to the OFB, with the result that the Army will be stuck with the BMP-3 that it has rejected in the past.
ReplyDeleteThe whole deal stinks...
At last the show begins! Lets hope MOD stays on course for this one. This FICV is greatly important for our Army .
ReplyDeleteAjai, does this mean the government agency will get the contract?
ReplyDeleteOFB's remain in monolithic period...
ReplyDeleteAim should have been to create public-private partnership, through linked ancillaries for systems and sub-systems with one lead integrater. In this manner, both OFs and private sector can progress and would also give a 'level playing field'.
ReplyDeleteThe private companies should challenge this decision. Any bidder must win on merit, fair and square.
ReplyDelete