By Ajai Shukla
Business Standard, 11th Dec 15
Speaking in New Delhi on Monday, the
defence ministry’s secretary in charge of defence production, AK Gupta, announced
an ambitious target to “achieve a level of 70 per cent [defence] indigenisation
by 2027.
Analysts regard this as unrealistic,
considering that Gupta himself estimates that “the indigenous content in total
defence capital procurement across all the three services has been hovering
around 40 per cent in [the] last couple of years.”
Pointing out that total indigenisation would
be unrealistic, Gupta said, “Practically, it may be possible to achieve 60 per
cent indigenous content along with capabilities in crucial technologies like
aero engines, avionics, precision electronics, sensors and radar technology
etc., in next five years, with a target to reach 70 per cent in further five
years.”
This, he said, would “take volume of
defence exports to $1 billion (Rs 6,675 crore) in five years and $3 billion (Rs
20,025 crore) in next 10 years.”
Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar, while speaking
in Panaji in August, had placed defence exports in 2014-15 at about Rs 630
crore ($94 million). Meeting the new targets would involve boosting defence
exports 10-fold in five years, and 30-fold in a decade.
Gupta presented figures to illustrate the
progress towards indigenisation (see graphic). Compared to 2010-11, when just
half of all procurement approvals were in the largely indigenous “Buy (Indian)”
and “Buy and Make (Indian)” categories, this went up to 86 per cent in 2013-14
and 94 per cent in 2014-15.
Gupta did not mention that, notwithstanding
the “Indian” in the names of these categories, “Buy (Indian)” category demands
only that the equipment be at least 30 per cent indigenous by value. The “Buy
and Make (Indian)” category requires the equipment to be at least 50 per cent
indigenous by value.
Highlighting the peripheral role played by
the Indian private sector, Gupta revealed that 90 per cent of India’s total
defence manufacturing output comes from the ministry’s eight defence public
sector undertakings (DPSUs) and 41 ordnance factories. These employ close to
1,60,000 workers.
Gupta, however, suggested that things were
changing. Since the Indian private sector was allowed into defence production
in 2001, “182 Indian companies have been issued 307 industrial licenses for
manufacture of licensable defence items till October, 2015. So far 50
companies, covering 79 industrial licenses, have informed about commencement of
production.”
The largest share of 88 industrial licences
has been granted in the fields of radar/ electronics systems/radio/avionics. In
addition, 51 licences have been granted for building rockets/missiles/torpedo/air
defence guns/unmanned aerial vehicles. Another 38 licences relate to
aeronautics; while 37 licences have been granted for night vision/sensor based
systems/optical goods.
With offsets frequently cited as a key
driver of indigenisation, Gupta revealed, “25 defence offset contracts are
under implementation with offset obligations of approximately Rs. 29,274 Crore
($4.87 billion). The(se) offset obligations… extend over a period of 14 years
i.e., from 2008-2022. Another 45 cases worth $8-10 billion approximately are
under different contracting stages.”
Further, 34 Joint Ventures (JVs) have been
approved for manufacture of defence equipment.
The % is not so critical as the kind of technologies. There are a lot of juvenile comments lamenting the indigenous content in the LCA. The point to undertand is that on the LCA we have indigenised critical technologies such as composite parts, radar, and flight control systems to name a few. We have failed in the Kaveri engine. The AMCA should be used to overcome barriers in a few more critical technologies. The thrust should be on metallurgy and more avionics. This is the way to grow.
ReplyDelete