The SoP-18 Tejas fighter will have a turn-around time between missions of 14 minutes
By Ajai Shukla
HAL, Bengaluru
Business Standard, 28th Oct 15
In New Delhi on September 23, decades of
friction came to an end when key stakeholders in the Tejas Light Combat
Aircraft (LCA) finally agreed on the specifications of a fighter that would
join the Indian Air Force (IAF) in large numbers, starting in 2018-19.
Termed “Standard of Preparation - 2018”
(SoP-18), these specifications were agreed between four agencies. Besides the
IAF, they include the Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA), which oversees the
Tejas programme; Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd (HAL), which builds the fighter, and
the ministry of defence (MoD).
SoP-18 involves four major, and several
minor, improvements. As Business Standard reported yesterday (“Cutting edge Israeli radar wins air force
approval for Tejas fighter”), a crucial enhancement in the SoP-18 Tejas
will be “active electronically scanned array” (AESA) radar, which Israeli company,
Elta, will develop with HAL.
Besides AESA radar, the SoP-18 Tejas will
be equipped with the capability for air-to-air refuelling; a “self-protection
jammer” (SPJ) mounted in an external pod to confuse enemy radar, and an improved
layout of internal systems to ease maintenance.
HAL is currently building 20 Tejas fighters
to the initial operational certification (IOC) standard. HAL chief, T Suvarna
Raju says, over the next three years, production will ramp up from four
aircraft this year; to seven in 2016-17; and eight in 2017-18, thus completing
the order for 20 IOC fighters. From 2018-19 onwards, 16 SoP-18 Tejas fighters
will roll off the line each year.
“Ramping up production to 16 Tejas per year
will cost us about Rs 1,252 crore. We have mutually agreed that HAL will
provide half the cost, and the IAF and navy will together pay the other half,”
says Raju.
Meanwhile, ADA will continue developing the
Tejas Mark II, replacing the current General Electric F-404IN engine with a new
GE F-414 engine. The IAF remains sceptical about the Tejas Mark II, but the
navy is certain the Tejas must have the more powerful F-414 engine to enable it
to get airborne from short aircraft carrier decks.
That means that, along with the SoP-18
Tejas that would remain in production till 2024-25, the Naval Tejas Mark II
would have to be somehow produced alongside.
Air-to-Air
refuelling
The integration of air-to-air refuelling has
been regarded as essential to give the Tejas enough reach. Currently, its
internal tanks carry just 2,300 litres of fuel, with another 2,400 litres
carried in external pods. However, external pods cannot be carried into battle,
and they take up two weapon stations, reducing the fighter’s punch. Without
external fuel tanks, the Tejas has a combat radius of barely 300 kilometres.
Air-to-air refuelling will step up combat
radius to 500 kilometres. Towards that, a late prototype of the Tejas, numbered
LSP-8, was fitted with an external fuel probe. This is being integrated and
will soon undergo flight-testing.
Says a veteran fighter pilot: “As important
than the ability to fight is the ability to turn up at the fight. That requires
long legs and, for a light fighter, that requires air-to-air refuelling”.
External
jammer pod
Tejas designers admit the absence of a
jammer to throw enemy radar off the scent is a key vulnerability of the Tejas.
While designing the fighter, they simply ran out of space for an internal
jammer. With the IAF dropping its insistence on an internal jammer, ADA and HAL
have now offered an “external jammer pod”.
While this threatened to reduce the Tejas’
weapons carriage by occupying one of its seven hard points, HAL is overcoming
that problem by fitting a “twin-arm” at that hard point. “One of the arms will
carry the jammer, while the other will mount an air-to-air missile”, says the
designer.
Maintainability
For the IAF, which must mount multiple
missions everyday with each Tejas fighter, easy “maintainability” and “low turn-around-time”
are key attributes. The HAL chief says the IAF wants the fighter to take
maximum 14 minutes between landing after a mission; and taking off for the next
mission, fully checked, rearmed and refuelled. Currently, the Tejas takes about
20 minutes.
“The IAF has carried out a ‘maintainability
evaluation’ on the Tejas, and provided requests for action (RFAs) to HAL. Each
RFA deals with a particular way to improve maintenance. We will be making 27
modifications in the fighter”, says Raju.
The Tejas already has built-in-test-equipment
(BITE), which is a software programme that automatically checks the
functionality of every crucial system. In case an aircraft system is not
working optimally, the BITE flashes a warning light.
On the other hand, if no warning lights are
evident, maintenance engineers know that all systems are working
satisfactorily. The need to check each one manually is no longer there.
This also involves fitting “pressure
refuelling” of the kind that exists in Formula One racing cars, which requires
fuel to be pumped under pressure into the fuel tanks. Refuelling the Tejas
takes just four minutes, and two more to fill drop tanks as well.
Pathetic production rate. HAL is completely displaying its diffidence. Compare this attitude to Sukhoi who have regularly produced aircraft first and then created a market for it because they met the user expectations. Does HAL have an ambition to export at all??
ReplyDeleteIs the AESA radar also developed under contract R&D where Israel keeps the technology and sales rights like Barak-8, LRSAM, MRSAM, etc?
ReplyDeleteWhen India scuttled the indigenous HF-24 program, it effectively killed generations of aerospace and defense industry build up...
ReplyDeleteAfter thousands of pilots falling from the skies, we did not learn any thing...
We still import everything including micro-light aircrafts...
I see a quantum change after Modi government but still I think India needs to know how to negotiate for contracts - technology and price...
May GOD bless India...
"its internal tanks carry just 2,300 litres of fuel, with another 2,400 litres carried in external pods. "
ReplyDeleteLCA carries 2458 kgs of fuel.
Kgs to Liters in fuel is roughly between 0.75 to 0.84Kg/L dependent on the temperature. So 2458kgs of fuel is roughly 3072 Liters using average of 0.8kg/L
Even the su-30MKI does not have an internal jammer. External is good, less interference, and easy to integrate and upgrade.
ReplyDeleteI wonder how Gripen NG manages 800 km combat radius.
ReplyDeleteHow about Tejas having over head pylons like Jaguar or pylons at far end of the wings like F16.
ReplyDeleteIt is a vicious circle,with users continuing to demand more and more new requirements to be built in and the builder taking more and more time to satisfy them !
ReplyDelete18 a year is too low. HAL needs to build up some production momentum, which in turn will convert into more orders. At least this project is not going the Arjun way .
ReplyDeleteAny update about Rafael jet and how it can be superior against Chinese and Pakistani planes?
ReplyDelete@ Broadsword : Is it Elbit or Elta that is Jointly developing the ASEA Radar with HAL ?
ReplyDeleteParagraph 3, last line indicates Elbit.
The radar system was developed by Elta, not Elbit. Elta does radar systems, Elbit supplies helmet mounted sights, ECM systems and the like.
DeleteI'm glad to see the Tejas finally coming into shape. The addition of the radar upgrade was key. The EL/M-2052 was developed as a modular plug-in replacement for the EL/M-2032, which was already integrated into the Tejas Mk 1. Unlike the U.S., the Israelis had a modular upgrade plan for their mechanically scanned radars - an outgrowth from the Lavi fighter program cancelled in 1987.
I noticed that there's a new book coming out on the Lavi at year-end.
http://www.amazon.com/Lavi-United-States-Controversial-Fighter/dp/1612347223
Despite canceling the production program, the Israelis are still reaping the benefits of that R&D effort, decades later. Something India can learn from.
Dear Ajai,
ReplyDeleteSlight correction on the combat radius range of 300kms mentioned in your blog. Per Govt of India press release, combat radius of HAL Tejas is 500 kms. Link below
http://pib.nic.in/newsite/erelease.aspx?relid=102056
Dear Ajai,
ReplyDeleteSlight correction on the combat radius range of 300kms mentioned in your blog. Per Govt of India press release, combat radius of HAL Tejas is 500 kms. Link below
http://pib.nic.in/newsite/erelease.aspx?relid=102056
This is also logical basis fuel burn rate of F 404 engine and fuel load (internal) of Tejas
hahaha ..SoP 2018-19 ...more specs - HAL will codevelop AESA lol...screwdriver HAL cant develop a a mechanical radar they will outdo themselves with the AESA...this sounds like IAF (Imported Air Force) playing the waiting game , wait for this NDA government with Modi's "Make in India" plan fail at the next elections in 2019 , hopefully UPA Madam and Saint will be back in power and imported air force can relaunch MMRCA ver2. A lot of imported air mashals in Chandigarh will earn their pensions.
ReplyDeleteFine article Col Shukla!
ReplyDeleteIts great that Tejas gets all these upgrades but even with IOC level Tejas, I have faith in the IAF that it will develop its tactics to incorporate best of the aircraft, It would have done so if we could afford only Bisons at this point of time..
As many say, numbers have its own quality, no bloody airforce would want to engage a swarm of tejas and that too an aircraft with such low RCS. A Tejas flying close to the ground might well be undetected for a long time till it has the target in range of its missiles.
Those tactics for Tejas will be developed in IAF squadron service, when Tejas is pitted against Su30s, Mig 29s, Mirage and also Rafale. If I could develop my tactic with all these different kind of aircrafts, I will go with it in war without thinking twice, making Tejas as effective as any other platform in the world.
All this being said, I think if at all we ever have a war, its just not going to be decided by Tejs or JF-17 or J20.. this nuclear heavy region of Asia has lots to lose if war mongers reign it. Im just hoping with Tejas, Indian manufacturing industry gets a boost and export orders so that our economy can grow and one day our country will not have any family without at least three meals a day.
Jai Hind!
TEJAS Mk1A - Made in India
ReplyDeleteHere are some details:
Engine - USA GE F414
Radar - Israeli ELTA 2052
Flight Controls - UK BAe Systems
Laser Pod : Israeli LITENING
ECM/ECCM - DRDO produced, but reverse engineered from Israeli designs.
AAR - Israeli refuelling probe system.
Ejection seat - Martin Baker or Russian
Weapons - French, Euro, UK, USA, Russian, etc.
(Astra, Derby, Python-5, R-77, R-73, Kh-59ME, Kh-59MK, Kh-35 & Kh-31, KAB-1500L, GBU-16, Paveway II, FAB-250, ODAB-500PM, ZAB-250/350, BetAB-500Shp, FAB-500T, OFAB-250-270, OFAB-100-120, RBK-500, Bofors 135 mm RP).
Inertial/Nav system/HUD - Mix of French, Israeli & Indian - locally integrated.
Airframe - HAL -
The last attribute makes it "HAL TEJAS" - a true tri-colour product of Indian ingenuity.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteGreat article Col Shukla!
ReplyDeleteCan you please check the turn around time details, I'm pretty sure 14 mins is not practical... And unless the pilot remains strapped in during hot refuelling, there is no way any military aircraft can be turned around in such a short time. (Missiles can't be put in any case) Does it have hot refuelling?
Anonymous
ReplyDeleteLets add more to your list:
Flight Controls - UK BAe Systems - actually being replaced by ISRO developed systems by next year
FBW - the most important part of the jet - Indian, ADA and NAL
Overall design - ADA, Indian
Aerostructures including composites (45% by weight) and most of the surface area - HAL, NAL, Tata, India
Avionics - HUD, Mission computing, displays, munitions control - ADA, pvt firms, BEL, HAL, Indian
Hydraulics & systems - HAL, Indian
Overall % by LRU which is Indian: 60%
HAL and ADA are now looking to raise it further since SP orders give more leeway to private firms for long term planning
In short, nice try with the snide remarks - but hardly factual
Which are the non agreed RFA s of LCA From IAF by ADA?
ReplyDelete