By Ajai
Shukla
Business Standard, 3rd May 2015
A sense of
drift is palpable within the Defence Research & Development Organisation
(DRDO), which has been without a leader for three months since the ouster of
its widely respected chief, Dr Avinash Chander, on January 31.
On that
day, Defence Secretary RK Mathur was given additional charge of Chander’s post
of Secretary Defence R&D for a period of three months. That period expired
on Thursday, April 30.
Mathur had held
charge of only one of the three posts that Chander occupied --- that of
Secretary Defence R&D. The other two posts --- Director General (DG), DRDO,
and Scientific Advisor to the Raksha Mantri (SA to RM) --- have lain vacant for
three months.
The defence
ministry is not alone in having key positions without incumbents. There has
been no Chief Information Commissioner (CIC) since August 22, and no Chief
Vigilance Commissioner (CVC) since September 28.
Without a
chief, there are problems in coordinating between the DRDO’s seven technology
clusters, each relating to a specific subject --- e.g. aeronautics, missiles or
naval systems. While cluster heads --- called “directors general” --- can
function independently within their clusters, major development projects
involve several clusters.
Amongst the
programmes suffering from this lack of leadership is the Tejas Light Combat
Aircraft (LCA) project. While the DRDO’s Aeronautical Development Agency
oversees the Tejas project, it has no authority over the four technology
clusters that feed into the LCA project. That coordination was always facilitated
by the DRDO chief, who personally oversaw the LCA programme.
Another
problem, say senior DRDO scientists, is professional insecurity caused by Chander’s
unceremonious removal. On November 28, the defence ministry had granted him an
18-month service extension to head the DRDO till May 31, 2016. Forty-five days
later, that extension was withdrawn.
The
insecurity is most obvious amongst junior scientists, most of who looked to Avinash
Chander as an icon of the DRDO’s successful missile programme. “With such an
accomplished scientist removed so arbitrarily, what job security do we have?” wonders
a young scientist bitterly.
Nor is
there any clarity about who might succeed Chander. Defence Minister Manohar
Parrikar had said while removing Chander that he wanted “someone good from the
DRDO who has the urge for development”. Parrikar also stated he wants a younger
scientist to head DRDO.
With almost
all the DRDO’s top scientists already on extension, or nearing the retirement
age of 60 years, eleven of the DRDO’s twelve top scientists might soon retire.
Of these twelve
“distinguished scientists” --- the DRDO’s top rank, equivalent to a lieutenant
general --- six have already crossed 60 years and are serving on extensions.
Another five are 59 years of age, knocking on the doors of retirement.
The only
candidate who fits Parrikar’s twin conditions --- being from the DRDO, and also
young --- is Satheesh Reddy, the highly regarded chief of Research Centre
Imarat, a missile technology laboratory outside Hyderabad. Reddy is just 52
years old.
Even so, MoD
sources do not rule out bringing in an outsider, possibly from the Atomic
Energy Agency, to head the DRDO.
There is
also speculation that the three hats the DRDO chief traditionally wore might be
split into two or more posts. Opinion on this is divided. The Rama Rao
Committee, which proposed reorganising the DRDO, recommended the three posts
remain vested in a single person. The subsequent Naresh Chandra Committee
recommended separation, though not trifurcation.
The
departments of space and atomic energy, which are often held up as models the
DRDO could emulate, centralise powers in a single chief. The chairman of the Space
Commission also heads ISRO (Indian Space Research Organisation), while
simultaneously advising the prime minister on space matters.
GRAPHIC: Who will
be the DRDO’s next chief?
Name
|
Appointment
|
Birth year
|
Age
(in years)
|
|
|
|
|
VG Sekaran
|
DG Missiles & Strategic Systems
|
1951
|
64
|
K Tamilmani
|
DG Aeronautics
|
1952
|
63
|
Bhujanga Rao
|
DG Naval Systems & Materials
|
1951
|
64
|
KD Nayak
|
DG Micro Electronic Devices and Cyber Security
|
1952
|
63
|
Sudarshan Kumar
|
CC R&D Production Control & Services Interaction
|
1954
|
61
|
Prabhakar
|
CC R&D Simulation
|
1954
|
61
|
S Christopher
|
Director, Centre for Airborne Studies
|
July 1955
|
Almost 60
|
Amol Anant Gokhale
|
Director, Defence Materials Research Laboratory
|
1955
|
Almost 60
|
A M Datar
|
DG Armament and Combat Engineering
|
Oct 1955
|
Almost 60
|
Manas Deb Mandal
|
DG Life Sciences
|
1956
|
59
|
Satish Kumar
|
CC R&D Technical Management
|
1956
|
59
|
Satheesh Reddy
|
Director, Research Centre Imarat
|
1963
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
Its better to be headless than to have a bobble head or a CONGI (appointed) head !
ReplyDelete