By Ajai Shukla
(Expanded version of Business Standard article)
10th March 2015
The defence
budget announced on February 28 has disappointed the army, navy and air force. With
acquisitions in the pipeline worth over Rs 20 lakh crore, military planners protest
that the capital budget allocation of Rs 94,588 crore --- not even a rupee more
than what was allocated in last year’s budget --- is far less than what is
required.
Rs 31 lakh
crore worth of acquisitions are needed over a 15-year period, say top level
sources in the Integrated Defence Staff (IDS), which carries out long term
planning of acquisitions for the three services. This is formalised in the
classified Long Term Integrated Perspective Plan (LTIPP), which compiles the military’s
equipment requirements over the 12th Defence Plan (2012-13
to 2016-17), the 13th Plan (2017-18 to 2022-23) and 14th
Plan (2023-24 to 2027-28).
Budget projections: 2012 - 2027
User
|
Capital
budget
|
|||||||
12th Defence Plan
|
13th Defence Plan
|
|||||||
2012-13
|
2013-14 (RE)
|
2014-15 (RE)
|
2015-16 (BE)
|
2016-17
|
2017-18
|
2018-19
|
2019-20
|
|
Army
|
10872
|
10749
|
16868
|
21574
|
23731
|
26104
|
28714
|
31585
|
Navy
|
16889
|
19600
|
17471
|
23911
|
26302
|
28932
|
31825
|
35008
|
IAF
|
31053
|
36017
|
31818
|
31481
|
34629
|
38092
|
41901
|
46091
|
Other*
|
11685
|
12506
|
15808
|
17622
|
19385
|
21324
|
23457
|
25803
|
Total
|
70499
|
78872
|
81965
|
94588
|
104047
|
114452
|
125897
|
138487
|
Capital
budget
|
|||||||
13th Defence Plan
|
14th Defence Plan
|
TOTAL
|
|||||
2021-22
|
2022-23
|
2023-24
|
2024-25
|
2025-26
|
2026-27
|
2027-28
|
|
34744
|
38218
|
42040
|
46244
|
50868
|
55955
|
61551
|
499817
|
38509
|
42360
|
46596
|
51256
|
56382
|
62020
|
68222
|
565283
|
50700
|
55770
|
61347
|
67482
|
74230
|
81653
|
89818
|
772082
|
28383
|
31222
|
34344
|
37778
|
41556
|
45712
|
50283
|
416868
|
152336
|
167570
|
184327
|
202760
|
223036
|
245340
|
269874
|
2254050
|
Adding to
the military’s disquiet is the repeated inability of the ministry of defence
(MoD) to spend the capital budget on new equipment. Year after year, chunks of
the capital budget are surrendered unspent, or diverted to the revenue budget
for funding running expenses like military salaries, and maintenance of
equipment.
In the
current year, the MoD has managed to spend only Rs 81,965 crore of the Rs
94,588 crore allocated for capital spending, a shortfall of Rs 12,623 crore. Rs
6,630 crore was returned to the finance ministry, while over Rs 6,000 crore
were diverted to expenses like salaries.
A Business
Standard analysis of equipment requirements over the next 15 years and the
likely fund availability during this period finds a precarious balance between
needs and means.
In the near
term, there is precious little money to meet the three services’ requirement of
Rs 20 lakh crore worth of equipment. However, as the years go by, especially in
the next decade, an expected real increase of 10 per cent per annum will have
allocated Rs 22.5 lakh crore by the end of the 14th Defence Plan in
2027-28 towards the military’s capital budget (see graphic below).
This includes
a cumulative total of Rs 5 lakh crore for the army, 5.65 lakh crore for the
navy, and Rs 7.72 lakh crore for the air force. Another Rs 4.17 lakh crore will
provide capital funding for Defence R&D Organisation (DRDO), Ordnance
Factory Board (OFB), joint staff, army railroads and military land and
buildings.
Given the
army’s requirements of Rs 5.29 lakh crore, that leaves a shortfall of Rs 30,000
crore. The navy will be short of Rs 1.75 lakh crore, given that it must spend
Rs 7.4 lakh crore. The air force alone might have the money it requires, with
budgetary projections providing it Rs 7.72 lakh crore to meet its equipment
requirements of 7.28 lakh crore.
These
projections assume that the distribution of funds between the three services
remains static. In fact, the share of the navy has steadily grown over the
years, rising from barely 5 per cent of the overall defence budget to 16 per
cent today. The military implications of a “Look East, Act East” policy might
result in further increases to the navy, with some analysts predicting that the
navy’s allocations might inch up to 20-23 per cent of total military spending.
That would come at the cost of the army and air force.
Future
budgetary projections are always uncertain, and Lieutenant General Anil Chait,
who coordinated tri-service budgetary and acquisition planning until he retired
as chief of the Integrated Defence Staff (IDS) last May, points out that Business
Standard’s funding projections assume low inflation and a stable rupee. With 60
per cent of the military’s equipment requirements being sourced from abroad, any
significant rupee devaluation would indeed buy less bang for the Indian buck.
Even so,
financial planners within the military admit that, given the current inflation
environment and a stable rupee, these calculations are probably realistic.
Army: battling for modernisation
System
|
Cost
|
Remarks
|
145 ultra light howitzers
|
5000
|
|
1580 towed artillery guns
|
15750
|
Cleared in Nov 2014
|
814 mounted gun systems (MGS)
|
4700
|
|
100
tracked self-propelled guns
|
3000
|
|
414
Dhanush guns from OFB
|
2000
|
|
2 regiments Pinaka rocket launchers
|
5000
|
|
Brahmos missiles
|
3500
|
|
Strategic missile systems (nuclear capable)
|
20000
|
|
Armour upgrade and new tanks
|
10000
|
T-72, T-90 and Arjun
|
Future Main
Battle Tank (FMBT)
|
60000
|
1000
new tanks
|
Future Infantry Combat Vehicle (FICV)
|
60000
|
2600 new ICVs
|
Short Range Surface-to-air Missile (SR-SAM)
|
30000
|
Develop and produce
|
Tactical
Communications System (TCS)
|
20000
|
Under
“Make” category
|
Battlefield Management System (BMS)
|
50000
|
Under “Make” category
|
Rifles, carbines, machine guns and sights
|
12000
|
|
Future Infantry Soldier as System (F-INSAS)
|
10000
|
Under “Make” category
|
Unmanned
Aerial Vehicles (UAVs)
|
6000
|
|
Dedicated army mobile networks
|
3000
|
|
Anti-tank
guided missiles
|
10000
|
300
Spike cleared
|
Surface-to-air missile systems
|
30000
|
SR-SAM and Akash
|
Miscellaneous gear, arms, ammunition
|
100000
|
|
Raising of mountain strike corps (MSC)
|
70000
|
Estimated cost
|
TOTAL
|
5,29,950
|
While the
army remains the service most in need of modernisation, land systems in general
are significantly less expensive than aircraft and naval equipment. A large
chunk of the army’s modernisation budget will go towards procuring, or
indigenously building, modern howitzers, rocket launchers and various missile
systems. There will be large expenditure on modernising the army’s mechanised
forces, including the indigenous development and production of a Future Main
Battle Tank (FMBT) and Future Infantry Combat Vehicle (FICV).
Also being
developed indigenously is the digital backbone for a “networked force”, which
will include communications and data networks like the Tactical Communications
System (TCS), as well as soldier-specific networks like the Battlefield
Management System (BMS), which was kick-started last week. Besides these
high-tech systems, the army will also spend on basic combat equipment,
including new rifles, carbines and machine guns.
Another big army expenditure will involve raising a new mountain strike corps (MSC) for
offensive tasks on the mountainous northern border. While the government had
announced it would spend Rs 67,000 crore on this new formation, most of that
money remains to be allocated.
Navy: trouble at the seas
System
|
Cost
|
Remarks
|
Six
Scorpene submarines (Project 75)
|
10000
|
Balance
payment
|
Six conventional submarines (Project 75 I)
|
60000
|
Being processed
|
Lease of INS Chakra from Russia
|
4200
|
Lease payments
|
Lease of second nuclear sub from Russia
|
5400
|
Lease payments
|
Two Arihant-class nuclear submarines
|
36000
|
INS Arihant follow-ons
|
Six nuclear-powered attack submarines
|
100000
|
DRDO project
|
Seven stealth frigates (Project 17A)
|
45400
|
MDL and GRSE to build
|
Four anti-submarine corvettes (Project 28A)
|
5000
|
Balance payment
|
Three stealth destroyers (Project 15A)
|
22000
|
INS Kolkata delivered
|
Four stealth destroyers (Project 15B)
|
30000
|
|
Two indigenous aircraft carriers
|
50000
|
Cochin Shipyard
|
Six Fleet Support Ships (FSS)
|
24000
|
|
150
Naval Utility Helicopters
|
15000
|
|
139 Naval Multi-Role Helicopters (Navy)
|
60000
|
First 16 being procured
|
8 Medium Range Maritime Recce (MRMR) aircraft
|
6000
|
|
8 P8-I Multi-Mission Maritime Aircraft (MMA)
|
12000
|
Deliveries began from December 2012
|
4 additional P8-I Multi-Mission Maritime Aircraft (MMA)
|
6000
|
8 procured earlier
|
4-6
Landing Platform Dock (LPD)
|
16000
|
|
24 Mine Counter Measure Vessels (MCMV)
|
36000
|
To be built in India
|
2 midget submarines for special operations
|
2000
|
Building in HSL, Vizag
|
12 Dornier aircraft
|
1850
|
Building in HAL Kanpur
|
10 Submarines overhaul
|
10000
|
|
16 ASW Shallow Water Craft (ASWC)
|
16000
|
|
Naval LCA Tejas development cost
|
3000
|
Including Mark II
|
65
Tejas fighters
|
12000
|
|
Miscellaneous gear, arms, ammunition
|
100000
|
|
Development of Karwar Naval Base
|
50000
|
West coast base
|
Development of Rambilli Naval Base
|
100000
|
East coast base
|
Development of Andaman & Nicober Comd
|
25000
|
|
TOTAL
|
7,40,000
|
The navy’s Maritime Capability Perspective Plan (MCPP) envisages
a 160-ship force that is centred on 90 capital warships, like aircraft
carriers, destroyers, frigates and corvettes. While there are currently more
than 140 vessels, the navy has barely half the destroyers and frigates it
needs. About five ships need to be inducted each year just to replace warships
that are decommissioned after completing their 30-40 year service lives. Much of the navy’s modernisation budget,
therefore, would go towards constructing new warships and submarines.
Submarines
will form a thrust area. These include twelve conventional submarines, of which
six Scorpenes would start rolling out of Mazagon Dock Ltd next year. Another
six will be built in India along with a foreign partner shipyard. The DRDO will
build another two nuclear missile-carrying submarines of the Arihant class
(SSBNs); and develop and build six nuclear-powered attack submarines (SSNs) in
India. INS Chakra, the SSN leased for ten years from Russia, will be joined by
a second leased SSN.
Capital
warships are being built in numbers, including seven stealth frigates under
Project 17A; four stealth destroyers under project 15B; two indigenous aircraft
carriers, INS Vikrant and Vishal, and four anti-submarine warfare (ASW)
corvettes under Project 28A. In addition, the navy will acquire six fleet
support ships (FSS), 4-6 landing platform docks (LPDs) for amphibious assaults
on enemy coast lines, 24 mine counter measure vessels (MCMVs) to guard against
sea mines laid by the enemy outside our ports, harbours and on shipping lanes.
Air strike capabilities
System
|
Cost
|
Remarks
|
126
Rafale medium fighter
|
120000
|
Under
negotiation
|
LCA Mark II development cost
|
2500
|
|
123 Tejas fighters
|
20000
|
|
125 Jaguar re-engining and upgrade
|
18000
|
|
51
Mirage 2000 upgrade
|
15000
|
|
80 Sukhoi-30MKI production
|
30000
|
Balance remaining
|
272 Sukhoi-30 overhaul
|
30000
|
|
Fifth generation fighter development
|
30000
|
Partnership with Russia
|
144
Fifth generation fighters production
|
65000
|
In
Russia and India
|
150 Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft
|
100000
|
Develop and build
|
Multi-role Transport Aircraft development
|
5000
|
Partnership with Russia
|
45
Multi-role Transport Aircraft production
|
6750
|
In
Russia and India
|
56 Avro aircraft replacement programme
|
15000
|
|
60 Hawk
advanced jet trainers
|
6000
|
|
22 Apache AH-64E attack helicopters
|
8500
|
|
15 Chinook CH-47F heavy lift helicopters
|
6600
|
|
126 Basic trainer aircraft (BTA)
|
5000
|
Pilatus and HTT-40
|
85
Sitara intermediate jet trainers (IJT)
|
8500
|
Being
built by HAL
|
384 Light Utility Helicopters (LuH)
|
13500
|
To be built in India
|
80 Dhruv/Rudra
advanced light helicopters
|
4000
|
Being
built by HAL
|
Surface-to-air missile defences
|
30000
|
MR-SAM and Akash
|
Miscellaneous gear, arms, ammunition
|
200000
|
|
TOTAL
|
7,28,350
|
With just
35 fighter squadrons operational presently against the air force’s authorised
strength of 42 squadrons; and with another 11 squadrons likely to be
decommissioned before the end of the 13th Defence Plan, the air
force’s focus is on acquiring fighter aircraft. Besides the Rafale medium
multi-role combat aircraft (MMRCA), it will buy six squadrons of Tejas light
fighters; 80 more Sukhoi-30MKI fighters under an existing contract; and upgrade
its fleet of 50 Mirage 2000 and 125 Jaguar fighters. There is an Indo-Russian
development programme under way for 144 fifth generation fighter aircraft
(FGFA); and another DRDO development project for at least 150 advanced medium
combat aircraft (AMCA).
Transport
aircraft are another thrust area, including the Indo-Russian programme to
develop a multi-role transport aircraft (MRTA); the replacement of 56 Avro
HS-748; and the on-going procurement of C-17 Globemaster III heavy lift
aircraft from the US. In addition, the air force is procuring large numbers of helicopters,
including the billion dollar purchases of the Apache AH-64E attack helicopter
and the Chinook CH-47F heavy lift chopper.
These
procurements do not include a host of high-tech development projects that are
planned for developing the battlefield capabilities of the future --- space
surveillance; launch-on-demand satellites; hypersonic vehicles that will
translate into more effective strike vehicles; electronic warfare systems;
cyber warfare capability; active armour; active counter-IED technologies,
unmanned combat aerial vehicles to replace manned fighters and a range of
drones that have precision strike capabilities. The DRDO also has programmes
under way to develop high altitude long endurance (HALE) and medium altitude long
endurance (MALE) drones, long range cruise missiles and an anti-ballistic
missile shield to shoot down incoming nuclear-tipped ballistic missiles.
None of
these have been budgeted for, except through the DRDO’s budget. However, in a
15-year perspective, some of these projects might will reach fruition, and
their introduction into service would require additional funds.
Given the need for fiscal tightening and the gravy train of NREGA and food, fertilizer and Fuel subsidies - where is the government going to get the revenue ?
ReplyDeleteAs such, the present state of fiscal consolidation is entirely due to the fall in the oil prices, the trimming of subsidies and the coal auctions.
Military spending lags the economy and as such military allocations can be expected to be more significant in the following years.
Col. under the Airforce CAPEX you've listed the LCA MK-II dev cost of 2500 crores twice.
ReplyDeleteI think you missed LCH in both Army Av and AF.
ReplyDeleteAlso SR Sam (Akash) for Army and lca2 dev cost for IAF have been counted twice.
Overall a very comprehensive article on projected requirements though bringing out the key thrust areas as well as gaps in funding clearly.
@Ajai sir
ReplyDeleteback in your blog after long time, have patience in reading the long post
I believe MoD and its constituents are the largest holder of land in India, i believe a lot of that land if put to use can help provide MoD with huge chunk of cash
Now lets talk about the modernization chart for IA, IAF, IN put up by you:-
IA:-
1. If i am not wrong MoD isnt buying ULH mainly due to cost. Improved roads can cut the need for ULH, your views
2. Why there is need to buy towed, mounted, tracked arty guns, feel 2800 MGS (like Caesar, C130J-SH can carry 2) will bring commonality, cut cost, your views
IN:-
1. I think there is no need to go for P75I afresh, as upgraded Scorpene can suffice, also Brahmos Mini that can be launched from Torpedo tubes will make SSKs a potent killing machine, it will cut cost, improve use/service, your views
2. Think having MRMR in the same platform as LRMR (Boeing 737) will increase commonality, service, your views
3. Think there was no need for 4 Destroyers under 15B, adding 4 more under 15A would have added commonality, cut cost, your view
IAF:-
1. Thanks for accepting that IAF will go for 350 Su30MKIs, (said it long back)
2. Still think after spending over US$25B on PAKFA & work share of just 20%, the number of PAKFA/FGFA should have been 250 atleast, your view
3. Feel that with Tata getting ready to build Do228 in India its upgraded version Do328 can fulfill need for HS748 replacement (meant for officer transport), your view
4. Feel setting up a assembly/MRO for C130Js not the SH will help boost business as well as negate need for MTA, your views
5. BTW you missed out of the LCH (light combat helo), think using LCH to shoot drones is like using sword to cut cake, your views
hope to get your answers
thanks
Joydeep Ghosh
Mr Editor,
ReplyDeleteIn the Army's Budget I see no funds allocation for Army Aviation.
No Budget Allocation for LCH,LUH,ALH/ALH-WSI or any support related infrastructure.
In the future Helicopters armed/unarmed will play a crucial role in combat operations. We get a glimpse of it in US/ISAF operations in OEF in Afghanistan and Desert Storm and OIF in Iraq.
They were used in Neptune Spear for executing Bin Laden and for that matter even the chinese landed and supplied its troops near DBO for the 20 odd day stand off with India.
They also were used in large numbers in the recent successful military operation which resulted in the inclusion of Crimea with the Russian Federation.
Attack helicopters are excellent for Anti Armour.
The Dhruvs and Rudras and LUHs would be a faster option for troop insertion, casualty evacuation, special operations and CI Operations when required to hover on station and provide CAS.
So why is the Army not cutting its costs on development of a new FMBT and FICV which together constitute 1,20,000 of the capital Budget.
No form of Armor today provides complete protection from IEDs which are the primary killers in Afghanistan today. No ICV can withstand shoulder launched RPG-7s fired from rooftops or close ranges in Urban areas.
Armor/ICVs are difficult to operate on the North Eastern front in Himalayan frontier. Once over the hump in Tibet of course is a different picture.
So why not invest in Air Mobile Fighting formations rather than Mechanized Infantry fighting formations ?
When we already have the helicopters nearing production.
The way ahead from this mess lies within the article. 1) SPEND the allocated budget this financial year! that itself will increase induction. 2) Increase indigenous production and design. This will itself increase buying power of budget. 3) Learn from Chinese example they are straigh away building 2 aircraft carriers without the prior experience of even having operated one!! Where is Indian spirit of innovative design??
ReplyDeletethe colonial feudal set up of the armed forces now is overburdened and needs a major overhaul where two service three service theatre commands are created , assets combined , manpower integrated and coatguard merged or integrated with navy . The intial training of officers and sailors be common and after 10 to 12 years in service segragated into navy and coast guard . higly trained , electrical , engineering and other arms and services can then be allowed to serve till 58 years in coast guard . similarly BSF , ASSAM RIFLES SSF ITBP SSB BE MERGED WITH ARMY AND BECOME FEEDER SERVICES FOR THE TRAINED OFFICERS AND RANKS WHO AFTER 5, 10 AND 15 YEARS BE SECONDED PERMANENTLY TO SERVE IN THEM .
ReplyDelete