By Ajai Shukla
Business Standard, 2nd Dec 13
Nine years into the tenure of the United Progressive
Alliance, the government is poised to appoint a tri-service military chief who would
be the government’s single point of contact on national defence.
Indications emanating from the military brass and the
ministry of defence (MoD) suggest that the army chief, General Bikram Singh, will
be appointed permanent Chairman of the Chiefs of Staff Committee (COSC) next
month. Simultaneously, Lieutenant General (Lt Gen) Anil Chait, heading the
Integrated Defence Staff (IDS), will succeed Gen Bikram Singh as the army
chief.
A permanent Chairman COSC would be a four-star general like
the chiefs of the army, navy and air force, but would wield less power than a
five-star Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) that a Group of Ministers (GoM) had proposed
in 2001. But the appointment would implement a key recommendation of last
year’s Naresh Chandra Task Force (NCTF) on improving national security.
There is already an ex-officio Chairman, COSC, who is the
senior most of the three service chiefs. This is a sinecure without real power,
as he is preoccupied with running his service, and also lacks adequate staff
and establishment. A permanent Chairman COSC, backed by an effective
headquarters and with the time to focus on tri-service matters, would be better
poised to coordinate between the army, navy and air force.
With the strategic community, and serving and retired
military brass, unanimously backing the proposal, this is seen as a win-win for
a government that has faced allegations of being soft on national security.
The MoD has not responded to a request for a comment.
The key to appointing a permanent Chairman COSC has been a
new consensus between the army, navy and air force. At the Combined Commanders’
Conference on Nov 22, Air Chief Marshal NAK Browne announced before the prime
minister that all three services had agreed on the need for a permanent
Chairman COSC, as an interim measure towards appointing a CDS.
The prime minister, in his speech, signalled concurrence. “We
require urgent and tangible progress in establishing the right structures for
higher defence management,” he said. If the services were in agreement, “I can
assure you of the most careful consideration of your recommendations by the
political leadership.”
In fact, the ball was already in play. In October, the
Chairman COSC, Air Chief Marshal Browne, had initiated a formal proposal for a
permanent chairman.
Browne is unlikely to benefit from the proposal since he
will retire on Dec 31 and is unlikely to be given an extension.
Instead, army chief Gen Bikram Singh, who will succeed
Browne as the senior-most service chief and ex-officio Chairman COSC, would
take over as permanent Chairman COSC when the cabinet clears the appointment,
probably in Jan 2014.
Gen Bikram Singh is likely to be succeeded as army chief by
Lt Gen Anil Chait, who would be the senior-most eligible general in the army
with effect from the New Year. Gen Chait would, in fact, be senior even to the
newly-appointed air force chief, Air Chief Marshal Arup Raha.
This chain of appointments would upend the apple cart of Lt
Gen Dalbir Singh, currently heading the eastern command in Kolkata, who is
currently poised to succeed Gen Bikram Singh as chief next year.
The need for a tri-service commander has been
institutionally articulated since 1999, when the Kargil Committee Report,
noting the difficulties in inter-service coordination during the Kargil
conflict that year, recommended the appointment of a CDS.
The appointment of a CDS would have meant a radical change
in the system of higher command. Since 1947, the four-star service chiefs of
the army, air force and navy had functioned autonomously under the MoD,
presenting it with single-service viewpoints rather than a single integrated
viewpoint. The creation of a five-star CDS would place the three service chiefs
under a powerful new appointment who would be in turn from the army, navy and
air force.
In 2001, a GoM endorsed the Kargil Review Committee’s
recommendation for a CDS. The government said it would consult with “various
political parties” before appointing a CDS. But, for a dozen years since then,
the air force blocked the proposal, fearing that army and navy CDSs would erode
the IAF’s influence and turf.
The IAF had been scarred by the experience of 1976-77, when
the maritime reconnaissance role and aircraft were transferred to the navy.
This apprehension was reinforced in 1986 when a range of light helicopters were
transferred to the newly established Army Aviation Corps.
As an interim measure, an Integrated Defence Staff was set
up for tri-service coordination, with a three-star officer in command of some
300 officers. However, with the four-star service chiefs able to have their
way, the IDS has made only partial headway towards improving inter-service
coordination.
so you must be having a ball..finally , an armoured corp chief..to set things straight(as per you)..hope u report everything with equal zest(that includes unfair , unequal treatment metted out to inf/arty)..
ReplyDelete& i also hope to take up issues pertaing to other services as well..aoc,asc,aad,engg.
I find it astounding that the first comment on this development panders to parochial mindsets! And the chap wants to remain anonymous too :) We should be overjoyed at our hierarchy finally getting its foot in the door insofar as strategic decision making structures are concerned.
ReplyDeleteI agree!
DeleteMr. Shukla,
ReplyDeleteFinally, a good step by lethargic MoD.
If, whatever you are reporting, happens, it will be a major step in the direction of the development of integrated joint commands.
Hope that MoD can see around -towards USA, UK, Australia, even China, and realize that having a proper military adviser to RM is a necessity. He may be a four star but he is NEEDED.
As far as Indian Air Force is concerned, it gets misguided during turf wars. It has no expertise of doing LRMR/ASW or MRMR/ASW or CASR in the sea. Neither it has any role in using attack helicopters or even medium transport helicopters for supporting ground campaign. It should focus on what it does best - strategic interdiction, air dominance, space dominance, fixed wing air transport and AEW&C. But instead, all the time it tries to gobble up anything that flies. Its high time it gave up its entire helicopter fleet to Army except CASR ones. In addition, those Jaguars with anti-ship missiles on west coast would need to go to Navy.
Hope it happens and all military branches stop singing their distinct tunes. And please tell these commanders to start corps level tri-service exercises.
Wake up commanders!!!
Long time in coming but finally it may be here.
ReplyDeleteIs the chairman a ceremonial post or effective commander of all the forces, the country has.
The Pakistani Chairman is a ceremonial post but Joint Chief of Staff - Chairman (USA) is halfway between effective commander and government of USA's single point of Contact.
What do we have now with additional bureaucracy.
Why should the Chairman Chief of Staff Committee should only be from the services. Why not the Chairman – COSC for instance from the accounts service, forest service, secretariat service or even from administrative service? In any case these cadres under the umbrella of MoD are already in a manner of speaking “running” the services. The Hon SC judgment on Rank Pay itself was amended by the IDAS boss and handed down to MoD for “implementation”. Such powerful cadres may also be considered for the exalted position. Then what about the claim of Shivshankar Menon the NSA who acts as the Super Chief between the services and the PM?
ReplyDeleteAt higher defence management posts are being created what about mid rung offr cadre which is very badly stagnated
ReplyDeleteBoy o boy , you really set the cat amongst the pigeons!!
ReplyDeleteA pretty significant percentage of our 90 Lt Gens and 297 Maj Gens must have spent the day yesterday poring over the Army list and working out "new lines of succession" and how it effects them !!
I do hope what you write comes true and that the resolve of the politicians doesn't waver as the election results start coming in.