By Ajai Shukla
Business Standard, 6th Nov 13
Today, in an almost too careful gesture of even-handedness,
the Indian Navy began a seven-day joint naval exercise with the US navy off
Visakhapatnam, even as the Indian Army kicked off ten days of joint training
with the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) near Chengdu.
The Indo-US exercise, codenamed Malabar, is the 15th
in a series that began in 1992 and has become an annual fixture in the
Indo-Pacific. The Sino-Indian exercise, codenamed Hand-in-Hand, is the 3rd
in an engagement that began in 2007, but then endured a five-year hiatus.
Interestingly, the ministry of defence (MoD) has taken pains
to reduce the profile of the Indo-US Exercise Malabar. This is evident from the
number and type of warships participating. Instead of the customary aircraft
carrier battle group, the US has fielded a solitary Arleigh Burke class
guided-missile destroyer, USS McCampbell, and a few P3C aircraft. India is
fielding just two warships, INS Shivalik and Ranvijay, and some TU-142M
maritime reconnaissance aircraft.
This is a marked reduction from last year, when a US carrier
battle group took part in Malabar 2012, with the aircraft carrier USS Carl
Vinson escorted by three other vessels. The Indian participation included five
major surface warships.
Exercise Malabar 2007, the highest profile ever; saw
Australian, Japanese, Singaporean and American flotillas train with the Indian
Navy off the Andaman & Nicobar Islands. China shot off a written
questionnaire, while India’s Left Front parties, indignant at what they considered
an anti-China gesture, staged political demonstrations along the east coast
against the warships exercising 800 kilometres away. That year, 13 major US
warships had participated, including two aircraft carriers --- USS Nimitz and
USS Kitty Hawk.
That Defence Minister AK Antony has taken note of Beijing’s
feelings was made clear in April, when India clumsily withdrew from a
trilateral exercise planned with the US and Japanese navies off the coast of
Guam. When American and Japanese officials arrived in Delhi for a coordinating
conference, they were taken aback to be told that New Delhi would not
participate.
New Delhi and Washington both cite budgetary cutbacks to explain
the reduced profile of joint exercises. The declining US defence budget,
compounded by the effects of sequestration (mandatory spending cuts), has in
fact played a role, for example in the Pentagon’s cancellation of the Red Flag
Exercise in Arizona earlier this year. But there is also growing conviction in
Washington that New Delhi is toning down the US relationship, apparently to
placate China.
Compounding these feelings is the MoD’s apparent inconsideration.
Earlier this summer, a US two-star general arrived in Delhi for a scheduled
meeting with a MoD official. When he arrived at South Block, he was told that
his interlocutor had gone to Italy in connection with the AgustaWestland AW-101
VVIP helicopter investigation.
Notwithstanding this, the MoD exudes optimism about US-India
defence ties. “Our navies are natural partners, and we look forward to
continuing to strengthen the bonds and personnel relations between our navies”,
observed the MoD today.
Yet US defence expert and Pentagon watcher, Manohar
Thaygaraj says there is cause for worry. “The number and scope of joint
exercises, which is usually cited as one of the strengths of the US India
defence relationship, has been steadily declining, partly for budgetary
reasons, partly for political ones,” he says.
Meanwhile, 160 Indian soldiers, who travelled to Chengdu,
China, started “counter-terrorism training” today with the People’s Liberation
Army (PLA). The first exercise of this series, Hand-in-Hand, was held in
Kunming in 2007, followed by a second in Belgaum the next year. In 2010, New
Delhi suspended defence exchanges after China denied a visa to India’s top
military commander in J&K. In July, during Mr Antony’s visit to Beijing, it
was decided to resume the series.
Since Nov 2003, India has also carried out joint naval
exercises with China, although these are far less sophisticated and operationally
oriented than the Malabar series with the US, the Konkan series with the UK and
the Varuna series with France.
Yes, there should be more such exercises in the (future) enemy's land....same as was done by Germany prior to WWII when they got themselves trained in the vast open spaces of the then Soviet Union and later on took advantage of the knowledge gained to inflict an almost crushing defeat on the Soviet forces.
ReplyDeleteThanks for this Ajai Sir. Nice, as always :-)
ReplyDelete- Tanuj, Noida