By Ajai Shukla
Business Standard, 5th Nov 13
Pakistan is being roiled by the killing of Hakimullah
Mehsud, executed on Friday by a US drone outside the North Waziristani town of
Miranshah. The feared leader of the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) was killed
at the gates of his house as he returned from a meeting with key aides at a
mosque in Miranshah.
Each one of Hakimullah Mehsud’s comrades who met him shortly
before his death now knows that the drone’s crosshairs were on them as they
discussed a peace talks proposal from Islamabad. They know they are alive only
because a Pentagon official decided to execute the strike later, probably to
minimise collateral damage.
These putative successors to Hakimullah also know
that, since the killing of TTP founder Baitullah Mehsud (no relation to
Hakimullah) in 2009, drone strikes have taken out a string of top jihadi
leaders, including Maulvi Nazir, Qari Zafar, Qari Hussain and Ilyas Kashmiri. A
drone strike in May reportedly killed Hakimullah’s deputy, Wali Rehman Mehsud.
Though the contenders for leadership know they will be
marked for death at the moment of their elevation, a succession struggle is
reportedly underway within the TTP. Like everything in the Federally
Administered Tribal Areas (FATA), which lies along the border with Afghanistan,
this is overlaid with tribal politics. According to Pakistani analyst, Daud
Khattak, the leading contender is Khan Said, alias Uncle Sajna. Since he is not
a Mehsud, he faces a challenge from that influential tribe.
Khattak reports that both the other strong contenders
--- Mullah Fazlullah, alias FM Mullah; and Abdul Wali, alias Omar Khalid
Khurasani --- are also non-Mehsuds.
For the jihadi leadership, an even greater concern than
the drone strikes that whittle away at their ranks is the expansive American network
of spies and informants in FATA. Without the ground information provided by
these informants, the drones themselves would be far less effective in homing
in on prospective targets.
As Mark Mazzetti describes in his book, The Way of the
Knife”, these spies draw sustenance from Pakistan Army bases in the tribal
areas. Probably for this reason, drone strikes have been particularly effective
against the TTP, which has declared war on the Pakistani state and killed
hundreds of Pakistani Army soldiers.
Even as the Pakistan Army supports Punjab-based,
India-focused outfits like the Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT), and its proxies in
Afghanistan like the Haqqani Network, the generals have understood that there
is no choice but to fight groupings like the TTP, which regard the Pakistani
establishment as their primary foe.
For that reason, the army’s General Headquarters (GHQ)
in Rawalpindi has been putting out that TTP leaders like Hakimullah Mehsud are
in the pay of Indian intelligence agencies. Painting the TTP in Indian colours
also helps explain to the Pakistani rank and file why they must now fight
jihadis who were historically regarded as allies, and even instruments, against
India.
Behind the closed doors of GHQ, therefore, the
generals would be silently celebrating the death of a militant leader who has
inflicted hundreds of casualties on the Pakistan Army, including the killing of
a two-star general in September. Embarrassingly, Shireen Mazari, the shrill and
hawkish security advisor of Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaaf (PTI) chief Imran Khan,
has publicly demanded that American drones be shot down if they enter Pakistani
airspace. The Pakistan Air Force could easily bring down these lumbering
aircraft but that is unlikely as long as they stick to “bad militant” targets
like Hakimullah Mehsud.
More potentially disruptive is Imran Khan’s threat to
halt the movement of convoys that take US military supplies through the
PTI-governed Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (KPK) province to Afghanistan. Pakistan had
blocked off this crucial supply route for seven months after 24 Pakistani soldiers
were killed in Nov 2011, in a NATO airstrike on army posts on the Pak-Afghan
border.
The PTI plans to move a resolution for blocking supply
convoys in the KPK assembly. Given that Washington has recently released $1.6
billion in military funding to Pakistan, the military will do what it can to undermine
that resolution.
Islamabad, grappling with widespread anti-Americanism
across Pakistan, has attacked the US for killing the man who many would agree
is that country’s Public Enemy No. 1. Even the most liberal Pakistani
commentators have lamented the timing of the strike, coming just before a
“peace dialogue” with the TTP. For Islamabad and Rawalpindi, the “peace
dialogue” was launched to demonstrate the unreasonableness of the TTP, which
was expected to make demands like the imposition of Shariat across Pakistan,
the release of all TTP prisoners and the withdrawal of the Pakistan Army from
the tribal areas. This, hoped Islamabad, would build public support for a
Pakistan Army offensive into North Waziristan. Instead, the killing of
Hakimullah Mehsud has provided a good reason for the TTP to call off the talks.
There seems to be dichotomy between what we are given to understand and what seems to be the state on ground.
ReplyDeleteThe overwhelming premise is that the Pakistan Army is all powerful in that country. However, the kind of reaction from various interested groups do not bear this out. Specifically when seen in the context of the killing of a General by the Taliban and the multiple attacks on the Pakistan Army personnel. Though when such incidents had occured there was widespread conmdemnation of the same but no vitrolic reaction of the intensity shown in the present case of the killing of Hakimullah Mehsud.
So, are we being misled? Food for thought.