Indian defence gains muscle from the Russian partnership but, contrary to the breathless reporting, no new contracts were signed yesterday
By Ajai Shukla
Business Standard, 25th Dec 12
Russian president Vladimir Putin’s sixth
visit to India on Monday has been his most barren yet in terms of defence
contracts signed between the two countries. An earlier Indian order, placed in
Feb 2010, for 59 Mi-17V5 medium lift helicopters was increased marginally to 71
helicopters. And a protocol signed last year for the purchase of 42
Sukhoi-30MKI fighters led to the signing of a contract for 42 kits for licensed
manufacture in HAL.
Never having had to compete for defence
contracts in India, Russia faces increasing difficulties in competitive
contracting, which is now mandated by the Defence Procurement Policy of the
Indian defence ministry (MoD). But Moscow remains India’s largest weapons
supplier, by virtue of transitioning up the procurement chain. A step ahead of
the competition, Russia has offered defence equipment first as arms sales, then
licensed production, then joint development, and the growing supply of what is
euphemistically known as “sub-strategic” systems.
One such system, the nuclear-propelled
attack submarine, INS Chakra, joined the Indian Navy in April on a ten-year
lease for US $920 million. Defence Minister AK Antony has confirmed that there
is a proposal to lease a second submarine. Russia’s ambassador to India,
Alexander Kadakin, terms the Chakra “a shining example of the very confidential
strategic cooperation between India and Russia.” Off camera, Kadakin flatly ---
and factually --- states that no other country would transfer such a system.
India pays a price for this privilege. When
Russia raised the price of the aircraft carrier INS Vikramaditya from $947
million to $2.3 billion, India quietly acquiesced. And when the delivery of the
vessel --- which was originally scheduled for 2008 and then delayed to 2012 ---
was pushed back by another year after a major engine failure during
pre-delivery trials in September, India acquiesced again.
The matter was raised during President
Putin’s visit today. It had been raised more strongly by Antony with his
counterpart, Anatoly Serdyukov,
when the former defence minister had visited India in October.
But Russia repeatedly compensates in the
“sub-strategic” segment that remains below the radar. The indigenous nuclear
ballistic missile submarine, INS Arihant, continues to benefit from significant
Russian technological advice.
Another strategic programme being
negotiated is for the “precision code” of Russia’s GLONASS satellite navigation
system, an alternative to the US Global Positioning System (GPS). This would
provide Indian aircraft and weapon systems with a navigational accuracy of one
metre, something that only US and Russian systems currently enjoy. MoD sources
tell Business Standard that the matter remains “under discussion” but will
eventually yield results.
Russian officials also cite the joint
development programmes that characterize Indo-Russian defence cooperation. The
Brahmos joint venture has yielded a sophisticated supersonic cruise missile
that is now being developed into a hypersonic missile that will travel at above
Mach 6 (4,300 kilometres per hour). The supersonic Brahmos, meanwhile is being
adapted to be fired from a Sukhoi-30MKI fighter.
Next year, design and development will
begin on the $6 billion Indo-Russian programme to jointly develop a fifth
generation fighter aircraft (FGFA). No other countries are collaborating on
such an advanced aircraft, which involves sensitive technologies like stealth.
Another Indo-Russian JV, Multirole Transport Aircraft Ltd (MTA Ltd), began work
this month on a military transport plane for both air forces.
Given the strategic relationship, New Delhi
considers Russian sensitivities. After the Russian MiG-35 was rejected in Apr
2011 in the Indian contest for 126 medium multi-role combat aircraft (MMRCA),
the MoD ordered 42 additional Sukhoi-30MKI fighter, without any tendering or
competition.
For Moscow,
New Delhi is an increasingly crucial partner, and not only because India buys
30% of all Russian arms exports. Joint development with India reduces
development costs and risk at a time when Russia is spending heavily on
modernising its forces. Its State Armament Programme will spend almost $650
billion to increase the proportion of modern weaponry in the Russian military
to 30% by 2015, and 70% by 2020.
Russian
analysts close to the Kremlin are urging Moscow to deepen “an emerging common
defence market” between the two countries. They are recommending the
co-development of a fifth-generation medium fighter program in addition to the
FGFA (which is a heavy fighter); and an advanced battle tank based on the
Russian Armata.
A correction: The so-called FGFA is NOT being "jointly developed", contrary to statements coming from HAL, MoD, IAF etc.
ReplyDeleteIndia shall only purchase 144 of the Russian-designed PAK-FA, outright. HAL will assemble it under license.
Even if some avionics etc. are customized, that won't count as "joint development". 'Cutomization' is a more appropriate term, and which we've already experienced with Su-30 MKI over the past decade.
I still don't understand why the Indian media keeps referring to the FGFA as a "joint development" between India and Russia.
US $920 billion?
ReplyDelete@ Anonymous
ReplyDeleteCorrected to $920 million... thanks
The friendship with erstwhile Soviet Union and then the Russian Union has stood our country in good stead. Its good that India values this relationship and is investing in it. So what, if there are some niggles as epitomised by the delay in the case of Vikramaditya. Don't we have have slippages in our own defence projects like the Tejas, Arjun etc. We must continue to have a cooperative relationship with the Russians.
ReplyDeletehello Ajai,
ReplyDeleteRecently I read an article in a defense website(forgot it name)about burgeoning India- Israel defense ties, which stated that Israel is willing to give cutting edge technology to India which US and even Russia is not willing to provide with.How true is that?
Ajay-ji,
ReplyDeleteHow is the photograph in sync with the article?
-regards,