By Ajai Shukla
Business Standard, 6th July 12
The United
States military, the world’s most technologically advanced force, paradoxically
fields some of the oldest weapons platforms on the planet. At least five
aircraft still in US military service are already more than 50 years old. And
they are set to serve for 3-4 decades more.
The Indian Air
Force has already bought one of these venerable platforms, the C-130 Hercules,
in its newest avatar, the C-130J Super Hercules. The IAF is on course to buy another: the CH-47 Chinook
helicopter. Trial evaluation has been conducted and a final decision is
awaited.
The other
half-century-old US aircraft (which are not on India’s shopping list) are: the
B-52 Stratofortress bomber that took to the air in 1952; the KC-135
Stratotanker mid-air refueller that first flew in 1956; and the T-38 Talon, the
world’s first supersonic trainer jet that has been flying since 1959. The US
Air Force still trains pilots on the Talon.
The IAF’s other
big American buy, the C-17 Globemaster III transport aircraft, is more than twenty
years old. The AH-64 Apache attack helicopter, which the IAF has trial
evaluated and is making a final decision on is more than 35 years old. So too
is the F/A-18 Hornet, which the IAF evaluated in the $17 billion medium fighter
competition before rejecting it.
US defence
experts have questioned the rationale for spending a fortune, as the Pentagon
has, on cutting-edge platforms like the F-22 Raptor and the F-35 Lightening II,
both next-generation fighters that cost hundreds of billions of dollars to
develop? Or, by extending this logic, for India to spend tens of billions on
newly designed fighters like the Rafale, rather than implement the IAF’s
suggestion to buy upgraded versions of the proven Mirage-2000 fighter.
Expensive,
custom-designed platforms are a waste, avers Admiral Jonathan Greenert,
America’s new chief of naval operations (CNO). In a controversial article just
published in “Proceedings”, the journal of the United States Naval Institute,
the influential CNO has argued for a “paradigm shift” that emphasises “payloads
over platforms”.
Greenert’s
argument is: fancy platforms (like the F-35 fighter, though he does not name
it) whose superiority is based on design attributes like “stealth”, get
technologically overtaken by an adversary’s evolving electronics capability.
But sturdy, flexible payload carriers (like an aircraft carrier, or like the
B-52 and the C-130) get outdated far more slowly since they are “inherently
reconfigurable, with sensor and weapon systems that can evolve over time for
the expected mission.”
Greenert argues
that, “the weapons, sensors, unmanned systems, and electronic-warfare systems
that a platform deploys will increasingly become more important than the
platform itself.” That justifies the logic of a fifty-year-old platform, with
continuously improving electronics, and “stand-off weapons” that can be fired
at the enemy from far away without endangering the platform itself.
Some of
America’s half-century-old legacy aircraft, which will serve 80-90-year service
lives, are:
B-52 Stratofortress
The giant,
eight-engine B-52 Stratofortress (aficionados call it the BUFF, or Big Ugly Fat
Fu**er) was designed in the early Cold War to strike the Soviet Union with
thermonuclear weapons. B-52 deterrence patrols remained permanently airborne
near the Soviet Union’s borders, ready to nuke designated targets. When the US
entered Vietnam in the 1960s, B-52s were modified to carry 27 tonnes of
conventional bombs, achieving notoriety for their “carpet-bombing” of communist
areas.
Today, the US
Global Strike Command still fields 85 B-52H bombers. This carries 31.5 tonnes
of bombs, mines and cruise missiles to targets 14,000 kilometres away. In
Operation Desert Storm against Iraq in 1991, 40% of the high explosive used was
dropped by B-52s. In the post-9/11 Iraq and Afghanistan campaigns, B-52s have
led the bombing, fitted with banks of computers that aim with deadly accuracy.
CH-47 Chinook
16th August will be the 50th
anniversary of the first Chinook delivered to the USAF. The heavy-lifting
helicopter was quickly deployed to Vietnam, where it became a battlefield icon,
carrying up to 55 troops into combat and lifting artillery guns to perilous
mountain positions.
Like the B-52, Chinooks periodically return
to their factory in Philadelphia for replacing mechanical and electronic
components in a phased modernisation. New capabilities are added, such as the
“pinnacle manoeuvre”, in which avionics permit the pilot to lower the Chinook’s
rear onto a pinnacle, or the roof of a house, even as the front overhangs the
drop. This allows it to pick up or deposit soldiers or stores in areas
inaccessible even to smaller helicopters.
The Chinook will remain in service till
2050, by when it would be 90 years old.
C-130 Hercules
The C-130 four-engine turboprop, which
entered service in the 1950s, has had the longest continuous production run of
any aircraft in history. In service with more than 60 countries, the Hercules
has accumulated more than 20 million flight hours.
The aircraft has steadily evolved with
additional range, updated avionics and night vision capability. The Hercules
has been used for transport and special forces tasks, as well as for weather
reconnaissance, flying into the eye of hurricanes, and for aerial spraying to
suppress mosquito-borne diseases. The latest version, the C-130J Super
Hercules, which the IAF has procured, takes off and lands in a shorter
distance, climbs faster, flies further and operates in pitch darkness. It will
remain in service for another 30 years.
KC-135 Stratotanker
This mid-air refuelling aircraft was
developed along with the Boeing 707 and was designed to refuel Cold War bombers
that carried nuclear weapons. It has, however, been the primary US refueller in
all operations since then. While the US has started the process of building a
new refuelling aircraft, many of the KC-135 fleet would remain in service till
2040.
T-38 Talon
Built by Northrop, the T-38 was the world’s
first supersonic trainer aircraft. It continues to train USAF pilots, with an
estimated 50,000 pilots having already honed their skills on the T-38. The US
has begun the process of identifying a new trainer, but the T-38 looks set to
continue in that role for some more years to come.
Good article Ajai-ji. All of these weapons platforms may be old, but these were way ahead of their times when introduced, and therefore, ever half a century later, they are truly second to none. This is why I think we made a bid mistake by not selecting F-18E/F for the MMRCA. It had everything we needed, plus was battle tested, and came with a proven AESA. All the other competitors came with their AESA either in development phase or only had just stated to build their first AESA at the time of bid submission.
ReplyDeleteTitle is a little misleading. 50 yr old just means the basic design is 50 yrs old. You can't compare the capability of the 1st version of the chinook to the latest variant.
ReplyDeleteIts really 50 yrs of evolution of a basic design that is now completely optimized to its fullest.
Cujo
Come on Shukla Ji, of course its a virtue when US continues to peddle "updated" variants of old hardware. It only becomes a blasphemy when Russia does so. But then what the so called "high & mighty" do shall be the "right stuff", right?
ReplyDeleteAt the end of the day as you point out correctly, its not the design age of the specific platform but value addition to its capabilities that makes it state of the art. (ducking for cover from salvos fired by Russia haters!)
nope, we will still not buy it.
ReplyDeleteThe key design parameter to aim for is not modernity but adaptability.These aircraft are still there and still valued because they could evolve whereas "superior"designs which could not evolve withered away. A small example was the British obsession of "burying" the engines in the wing. The Victor ,Vulcan,Valiant and the DH Comet all had buried engines but it was uneconomically difficult to re-engine these aircraft and they slowly faded out. The B&37 had the German idea of pylons which had more wetted area but engine thrust increase via newer technology engines was a cinch. The second point is old indeed is gold .Look at what is happening with OBOGS. Make haste slowly.
ReplyDeleteThe fact is adaptability and versatility rather than "modernity " was always a winner everywhere.The podded engine of the Buff is "yuck" in many ways but it has allowed the old thing to be re-engined or up engined easily.The British obsession with the "buried" engine which was "aerodynamically cleaner" Vulcan,victor,Valiant & Comet also helped to push these fine aircraft towards extinction.
ReplyDelete@Ajai sir
ReplyDeleteUS is still using some of its flying platforms that are over 50 years old.
This gives rise to questions on C17 Globemaster III, which is similar in terms of usability with the aircrafts mentioned above.
1. C17 production is being shutdown by 2014 because there is no scope for further improvement in the plane or because its becoming uneconomical for the US to make C17s?
2. What type of plane can replace the C17s?
3. How many C17s you think India should order apart from the 10 ordered?
Hope to get answers
Thanks
Joydeep Ghosh